Effects of Blended Learning in Comparison of Traditional Learning to Provide Safer Learning Environment- A Comparative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v2i6.209Abstract
Learning strategies have shifted from conventional information to communication technology-based learning since the beginning of the twenty-first century. A study of published articles on blended and traditional learning strategies was done to emphasise the value and significance of both learning strategies and to investigate their efficacy in promoting a safer learning environment in different educational levels. Thirty-six (36) research articles from various disciplines published in Web of Science and Scopus databases were chosen for review. According to the review of researches, blended learning demonstrated to be a more successful learning approach than traditional learning strategy in the majority of studies. Twenty-five (25) studies found a statistically more significant benefit in blended learning strategy for academic success, critical and creative abilities, and a safer learning environment in diverse disciplines, out of 36 published articles evaluated. Based on the findings of this study, it is strongly suggested that blended learning strategies be used to attain high academic and professional goals while also providing a safer learning environment in educational institutions and society.
Downloads
References
Abedi, P., Keshmirshekan, M. H., & Namaziandost, E. (2019). The comparative effect of flipped classroom instruction versus traditional instruction on Iranian intermediate EFL learners' English composition writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 6(4), 43-56. http://www.jallr.com/
Adams, A. E., Randall, S., & Traustadóttir, T. (2015). A tale of two sections: An experiment to compare the effectiveness of a hybrid versus a traditional lecture format in introductory microbiology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), ar6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0118
Albiladi, W. S., & Alshareef, K. K. (2019). Blended learning in English teaching and learning: A review of the current literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 232-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1002.03
Alzahrani, M. G. (2017). The Developments of ICT and the Need for Blended Learning in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(9), 79-87. http://www.iiste.org/
Arias, A., Scott, R., Peters, O. A., McClain, E., & Gluskin, A. H. (2016). Educational outcomes of small‐group discussion versus traditional lecture format in dental students’ learning and skills acquisition. Journal of Dental Education, 80(4), 459-465. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2016.80.4.tb06104.x
Aristovnik, A., Tomazevic, N., Kerzic, D., & Umek, L. (2017). The impact of demographic factors on selected aspects of e-learning in higher education. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-09-2016-0045
Asarta, C. J., & Schmidt, J. R. (2017). Comparing student performance in blended and traditional courses: Does prior academic achievement matter? The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.002
Baker, D. M. (2018). USA and Asia Hospitality & Tourism Students' Perceptions and Satisfaction with Online Learning versus Traditional Face-to-Face Instruction. e-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 12(2), 40-54. http://www.ejbest.org
Banyen, W., Viriyavejakul, C., & Ratanaolarn, T. (2016). A Blended Learning Model for Learning Achievement Enhancement of Thai Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(4), 48-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i04.5325
Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2018). Blended learning and traditional learning: A comparative study of college mechanics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2889-2900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9748-9
Blissitt, A. M. (2016). Blended learning versus traditional lecture in introductory nursing pathophysiology courses. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(4), 227-230. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20160316-09
Choi, E., Lindquist, R., & Song, Y. (2014). Effects of problem-based learning vs. traditional lecture on Korean nursing students' critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning. Nurse education today, 34(1), 52-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.012
Cuesta Medina, L. (2010). Metacognitive instructional strategies: A study of e-learners’ self-regulation. Paper presented at the Fourteenth International CALL Conference: Motivation and Beyond, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Daud, S., Chaudhry, A. M., & Ali, S. K. (2016). Lecture based versus peer assisted learning: Quasi-experimental study to compare knowledge gain of fourth year medical students in community health and nutrition course. Research and Development in Medical Education, 5(2), 62-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/rdme.2016.013
Dehghanzadeh, S., & Jafaraghaee, F. (2018). Comparing the effects of traditional lecture and flipped classroom on nursing students' critical thinking disposition: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 71, 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.027
Delialioğlu, Ö. (2012). Student engagement in blended learning environments with lecture-based and problem-based instructional approaches. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 310-322. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.15.3.310
Eryilmaz, M. (2015). The effectiveness of blended learning environments. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 8(4), 251-256. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v8i4.9433
Farashahi, M., & Tajeddin, M. (2018). Effectiveness of teaching methods in business education: A comparison study on the learning outcomes of lectures, case studies and simulations. The International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.01.003
Frame, T. R., Cailor, S. M., Gryka, R. J., Chen, A. M., Kiersma, M. E., & Sheppard, L. (2015). Student perceptions of team-based learning vs traditional lecture-based learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe79451
Fulford, A., & Mahon, A. (2018). The philosophical defence of the traditional lecture. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www. Times higher education. com/blog/philosophical defence-traditional-lecture# survey-answer.
Furió, D., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Vivó, R. (2015). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12071
Gholami, M., Moghadam, P. K., Mohammadipoor, F., Tarahi, M. J., Sak, M., Toulabi, T., & Pour, A. H. H. (2016). Comparing the effects of problem-based learning and the traditional lecture method on critical thinking skills and metacognitive awareness in nursing students in a critical care nursing course. Nurse education today, 45, 16-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.06.007
Giorgdze, M., & Dgebuadze, M. (2017). Interactive teaching methods: challenges and perspectives. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 3(9), 544-548. http://ijaedu.ocerintjournals.org/
Gooblar, D. (2019). 1. Helping Students Revise Themselves. Active Learning Strategies. In The Missing Course (pp. 14-43). Harvard University Press.
Guarascio, A. J., Nemecek, B. D., & Zimmerman, D. E. (2017). Evaluation of students' perceptions of the Socrative application versus a traditional student response system and its impact on classroom engagement. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(5), 808-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.05.011
Harandi, S. R. (2015). Effects of e-learning on Students’ Motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 423-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.905
Hattie, J. (2018). 250+ influences on student achievement. Visible learning plus. Retrieved August 6, 2018 from: https://us.corwin.com/sites/default/files/250_influences_-_7.18.18.pdf
Hockly, N. (2018). Blended learning. Elt Journal, 72(1), 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx058
Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5
Huggins, C. M., & Stamatel, J. P. (2015). An exploratory study comparing the effectiveness of lecturing versus team-based learning. Teaching Sociology, 43(3), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0092055X15581929
Hyun, J., Ediger, R., & Lee, D. (2017). Students' Satisfaction on Their Learning Process in Active Learning and Traditional Classrooms. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 108-118. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
Ilic, D., Nordin, R. B., Glasziou, P., Tilson, J. K., & Villanueva, E. (2015). A randomised controlled trial of a blended learning education intervention for teaching evidence-based medicine. BMC medical education, 15(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0321-6
Jong, J. P. (2016). The effect of a blended collaborative learning environment in a small private online course (SPOC): A comparison with a lecture course. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(2), 194.
Jusoh, N. M., Rebuan, H. M. A., Aung, M. M. T., Mohamad, M., Husain, R., Esa, A. R., & Ismail, S. (2016). undergraduate medical students’attitude and preferences toward traditional lecture versus informal cooperative learning. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 16(2), 55-63.
Khalid, A., & Azeem, M. (2012). Constructivist vs traditional: effective instructional approach in teacher education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 170-177. http://www.ijhssnet.com/
Khatiban, M., Falahan, S. N., Amini, R., Farahanchi, A., & Soltanian, A. (2019). Lecture-based versus problem-based learning in ethics education among nursing students. Nursing Ethics, 26(6), 1753-1764. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0969733018767246
Lochner, L., Wieser, H., Waldboth, S., & Mischo-Kelling, M. (2016). Combining traditional anatomy lectures with e-learning activities: how do students perceive their learning experience? International journal of medical education, 7, 69. https://dx.doi.org/10.5116%2Fijme.56b5.0369
Lu, O.H., Huang, A.Y., Huang, J.C., Lin, A.J., Ogata, H. and Yang, S.J. (2018), “Applying learning analytics for the early prediction of Students’ academic performance in blended learning”, Journal of Educational Technology and Society, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 220-232. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26388400
Luna, Y. M., & Winters, S. A. (2017). “Why did you blend my learning?” A comparison of student success in lecture and blended learning introduction to sociology courses. Teaching Sociology, 45(2), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0092055X16685373
Makhdoom, N., Khoshhal, K. I., Algaidi, S., Heissam, K., & Zolaly, M. A. (2013). ‘Blended learning’as an effective teaching and learning strategy in clinical medicine: a comparative cross-sectional university-based study. Journal of taibah university medical sciences, 8(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2013.01.002
Marchalot, A., Dureuil, B., Veber, B., Fellahi, J. L., Hanouz, J. L., Dupont, H., ... & Compère, V. (2018). Effectiveness of a blended learning course and flipped classroom in first year anaesthesia training. Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, 37(5), 411-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2017.10.008
Masood, S., & Yousuf, N. (2018). Blended learning: a pedagogical alternative to traditional learning in dermatology. Journal of Pakistan Association of Dermatology, 27(2), 99-101.
Meguid, E. A., & Collins, M. (2017). Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: traditional versus interactive teaching. Advances in medical education and practice, 8, 229. https://dx.doi.org/10.2147%2FAMEP.S131851
Miller, C. J., McNear, J., & Metz, M. J. (2013). A comparison of traditional and engaging lecture methods in a large, professional-level course. Advances in physiology education, 37(4), 347-355. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00050.2013
Mukaddes Erdem, Pınar NuhoğluKibar, students‟ opinions on Facebook supported blended learning environment, the Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – January 2014, volume 13 issue 1 p.199
Nalini, G. K., Deepak, P., Neelamma, P., Sahana, G. N., & Jayashree, V. N. (2020). Effectiveness of digital learning versus traditional learning among undergraduate students–Prescription writing. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 10(01). DOI: 10.5455/njppp.2020.10.0828816102019
Oderinu, O. H., Adegbulugbe, I. C., Orenuga, O. O., & Butali, A. (2020). Comparison of students' perception of problem‐based learning and traditional teaching method in a Nigerian dental school. European Journal of Dental Education, 24(2), 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12486
Safari, M., Yazdanpanah, B., & Hatamipour, S. (2020). Learning outcomes and perceptions of midwifery students about peer-teaching and lecture method in gynecology and infertility course. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(3), 291-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2020063039
Samuelson, D. B., Divaris, K., & De Kok, I. J. (2017). Benefits of case‐based versus traditional lecture‐based instruction in a preclinical removable prosthodontics course. Journal of Dental Education, 81(4), 387-394. https://doi.org/10.21815/JDE.016.005
Scott, C. E., Green, L. E., & Etheridge, D. L. (2016). A comparison between flipped and lecture-based instruction in the calculus classroom. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2015-0024
Sheikhaboumasoudi, R., Bagheri, M., Hosseini, S. A., Ashouri, E., & Elahi, N. (2018). Improving nursing Students' learning outcomes in fundamentals of nursing course through combination of traditional and e-learning methods. Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research,
(3), 217. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2Fijnmr.IJNMR_79_17
Shi, Y., Peng, C., Zhang, X., & Yang, H. H. (2017, June). Interactive whiteboard-based instruction versus lecture-based instruction: A study on college students’ academic self-efficacy and academic press. In International Conference on Blended Learning (pp. 319-328). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59360-9_28
Suryanti, S., Wicaksono, B. H., Inayati, N., & Setiawan, S. (2020). EFL Teacher Blended Professional Training: A Review of Learners’ Online and Traditional Learning Interactions Quality. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 26(3). http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2603-10
Tseng, H., & Walsh Jr, E. J. (2016). Blended vs. traditional course delivery: Comparing students’ motivation, learning outcomes, and preferences. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 1-21.
Wei, Y., Shi, Y., Yang, H. H., & Liu, J. (2017, June). Blended learning versus traditional learning: a study on students’ learning achievements and academic press. In 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 219-223). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2017.57
Wong, W. K., & Ng, P. K. (2016). An empirical study on e-learning versus traditional learning among electronics engineering students. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 13(6), 836-844. DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2016.836.844
Yashwant, A. V., Arayambath, B., Murugaboopathy, V., Kommi, P. B., Prashad, K. V., & Rajasekaran, U. B. (2020). Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Blended Learning Versus Traditional Learning in Cephalometrics for Undergraduates. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 54(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0301574219883873
Zhang, W., & Zhu, C. (2020). Blended Learning as a Good Practice in ESL Courses Compared to F2F Learning and Online Learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 12(1), 64-81. DOI: 10.4018/IJMBL.2020010105.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
