Pretrial and Its Contribution To Protection Of The Rights Of Suspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i2.313Keywords:
Pretrial, Protection of Suspect's Rights, CourtAbstract
People suspected of committing a crime must be respected for their human rights. To find evidence that the person suspected of committing a crime is guilty, one or several methods of coercion must be used. In upholding and respecting the human rights of alleged perpetrators of criminal acts, the process of arrest and detention must be by procedures. If not according to guidelines, pretrial efforts can be carried out. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the pretrial has provided legal benefits to the suspect's rights. The specification of this research is analytical descriptive, with normative juridical research type. Methods of data collection through collecting secondary legal materials, which include; books, laws and regulations, documents, journals, and scientific articles. Based on this research, it is found that in practice, the implementation of the pretrial trial has not been able to maximally provide legal benefits to the rights of the pretrial Petitioner. The pretrial Judge has tried to make it happen. However, if the Petitioner feels that his rights are still not protected and what is requested by the pretrial Petitioner, it is because of the facts in the Judge and the provisions in the Court. The applicable law makes the Judge unable to give a decision anymore. In addition, to provide legal benefits to the suspect as a pretrial Petitioner and then grant his request, there are still several obstacles or obstacles, including not fully understanding the meaning, scope, and existence of this pretrial. Put forward other facts that can be taken into consideration by pretrial judges in making decisions. In addition, some pretrial judges are less thorough in examining what things will be requested or requested in the submission and pretrial examination.
Downloads
References
Loebby Loqman, Pra Peradilan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1990.
L. Hakim, P. Paidjo, and T. M. Alamsyah Putra, “Perlindungan Hukum Korban Salah Tangkap Oleh Kepolisian Republik Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, vol. 3, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.30996/jhmo.v3i1.2786.
M. Muntaha, “Kedudukan Pra Peradilan Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia,” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, vol. 29, no. 3, 2018, doi: 10.22146/jmh.22318.
U. M. Sosiawan, “Konstruksi Pra Peradilan Melalui Rekonstruksi Hakim Komisaris sebagai Perlindungan Hak Tersangka dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, vol. 18, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.30641/dejure.2018.v18.73-92.
S. H. Wahyu Rahman, “Wewenang Praperadilan: Memeriksa Dan Memutus Penetapan Status Tersangka,” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum: De’Jure, 2019.
Agus Setiawan, . M., . S. K., A. Nur Fata, and A. Adriansyah, “Reconstruction of Judge Authorities on Pretrial in Indonesia Based on Justice Value,” Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, vol. 4, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.36348/sijlcj.2021.v04i01.003.
V. C. Pratama and L. Tappangan, “Urgensi Hakim Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan dalam Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia,” Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), vol. 3, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.34007/jehss.v3i2.398.
I. M. W. W. Kusuma, I. M. Sepud, and N. M. S. Karma, “Upaya Hukum Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia,” Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, vol. 1, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.22225/juinhum.1.2.2438.73-77.
M. Y. Siregar and doi: 10. 36987/jiad. v6i2. 249. Z. A. Pakpahan, [1] M. Y. Siregar and Z. A. Pakpahan, “KEWENANGAN MENGAJUKAN PRA PERADILAN ATAS PENETAPAN TERSANGKA DI TINJAU DARI SEGI HUKUM,” JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI, vol. 6, no. 2, 2018, “Kewenangan Mengajukan Pra Peradilan Atas Penetapan Tersangka Di Tinjau Dari Segi Hukum,” JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI, vol. 6, no. 2, 2018, doi: 10.36987/jiad.v6i2.249.
“Revitalisasi Lembaga Pra Penuntutan Guna Menyokong Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia,” LEX ADMINISTRATUM, vol. 4, no. 2, 2016.
R. M. Rozi, “Revitalisasi Lembaga Pra Penuntutan Guna Menyokong Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia,” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, vol. 6, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i1.124.
“Fungsi dan Kewenangan Praperadilan,” Pandecta (Jurusan Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Semarang), vol. 6, no. 1, 2013, doi: 10.15294/pandecta.v6i1.2323.
S. Wulandari, “Kajian Tentang Praperadilan Dalam Hukum Pidana,” Jurnal Ilmiah UNTAG Semarang, vol. 4, 2015.
D. Hartono and M. Maryanto, “Peranan Dan Fungsi Praperadilan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Polda Jateng,” Jurnal Daulat Hukum, vol. 1, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.30659/jdh.v1i1.2564.
Rusman Sumadi, “Praperadilan Sebagai Sarana Kontrol Dalam Melindungi Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Tersangka,” Jurnal Hukum Sasana, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.31599/sasana.v7i1.597.
A. Hikmoro, “Peranan Dan Fungsi Praperadilan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 1, no. 1, 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
