The Influence Of Prospective Students' Motivation To Determine Higher Education Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i2.351Abstract
This study aims to determine the motivational factors of Labuhanbatu University students in choosing a
college. This research is an exploratory research through policy evaluation. The data analysis method used
in this research is descriptive quantitative. The sampling technique used is multistage random sampling,
according to Arikunto, which is 25% of the population. The data analysis technique used is the Analytical
Hierarchy Process (AHP). From the data that the authors obtained, there are five motivational factors
studied. The highest rank is related to motivational factors in determining tertiary institutions, namely
achievement motivation factors with eigenvector value = 0.31, university image motivation factors with
eigenvector = 0.25, motivational process factors with eigenvector = 0.20, educational zoning motivation
factors with eigenvector = 0.14 and the motivation factor of alumni perception with eigenvector = 0.10. This
shows that of the five motivational factors obtained, the most dominant motivational factor is achievement
motivation (first rank) after completing his education. The second most dominant factor is the university's
image. The image of a university greatly influences why students choose to continue to higher education
here. Labuhanbatu University which is well accredited is a university that is targeted by prospective new
students who want to continue their education at Labuhanbatu University.
Downloads
References
Agus, Ahyari. (1994). Penganggaran Perusahaan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Edisi 1. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Alimul,
Hidayat A.A. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kesehatan Paradigma Kuantitatif, Jakarta: Heath Book. Arikunto,
Suharsimi. (1988). Produser Penelitian ; Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta Bimo, Walgito.,
(2004). Pengantar Psikologi Umum.Jakarta: Andi.
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R and David Balkin. (2013). Management People Perfomance Change.New Jersey: Pearson
Education inc Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Indriyanti, Dkk. (2013). ”Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Minat Melanjutkan Pendidikan Ke Perguruan
Tinggi Pada Siswa Kelas Xii Akuntansi Smk Negeri 6 Surakarta Tahun 2013”. Jurnal, Jupe UNS, Vol. 1, No. 2,
Hal 1 s/d 10. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Kotler, Philip. (2005). Manajemen Pemasaran. Jilid 1 dan 2. Jakarta: PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia. Lindgren,
H.C. (1976). Educational Psyhology in the Classroom. New York: John Wiley
M. Enoch Markum, (2007:19). Pendidikan tinggi dalam prefektif sejarah dan perkembangannya di Indonesia
Jakarta: U1 Press
Pickle, H. B. & Abrahamson, R. L. (1989). Small Business Management. Singapore: John Wiley & Son (SEA)
Pte. Ltd.
Reece, Barry L.; Brandt, Rhonda; dan Howie, Karen F. (2011). Effective Human Relations: Interpersonal and
Organizational Applications. (11th ed.). Canada: by Nelson Education, Ltd.
Saaty, Thomas L. (1993). Pengambilan Keputusan Bagi Para Pemimpin, Proses Hirarki Analitik untuk
Pengambilan Keputusandalam Situasi yang Kompleks. Setiono L, penerjemah; Peniwati K, editor. Jakarta:
PT.Pustaka Binaman Pressindo. Terjemahan dari: Decision Making for Leaders The Analytical Hierarchy
Process for Decisions in Complex World.
Saputra, M. A. S. (2017) Dengarkanlah. Yogyakarta: Deepublish. Tersedia pada:
https://penerbitbukudeepublish.com/shop/buku-dengarkanlah/.
Setyosari, Punaji. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengembangan.Jakarta: Kencana. Steers, R. M. &
Porter, L. W. (1991). Motivation and Work Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Stewart, G & Brown, K.G., (2011). Human Resource Management (2nd Ed). United State: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
