Changing Patterns Of Industrial Relationships In The Responsive And Justice Era Of The Industrial Revolution 4.0


  • Agatha Jumiati Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Waluyo Slamet Pradoto Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta, Indonesia



Industrial Relations Patterns, Industrial Revolution 4.0, Responsive Law and Justice


The Industrial Revolution 4.0 in the industrial sector has brought changes, one of which is a change concerning
the pattern of industrial relations between workers and employers. The pattern of industrial relations before the
Industrial Revolution 4.0 was a pattern of relationships based on work agreements. While the pattern of industrial
relations after the Industrial Revolution 4.0 underwent a change where the pattern of industrial relations created
was based on partnership relations. The pattern of industrial relations based on partnership relations creates an
equal or equal relationship and not a multilevel relationship. From the perspective of responsive law, it views the
law as an inseparable part of the social world that surrounds it so that the law is not only truly functional and
useful in serving the community but is also able to respond to the aspirations and social needs to be served. In a
responsive legal order, law is a social institution. Therefore, law is not only seen as a mere regulatory system, but
also how the law carries out social functions in and for society. From the perspective of the Theory of Justice
presented by John Rawls, it can be concluded that the changing pattern of industrial relations in the Industrial
Revolution 4.0 era is in line with the basic principles of justice, namely the principle of freedom and the principle
of distribution of income or wealth. This can be reflected in the freedom to draw up work agreements to be made
between workers and employers. Besides, the opportunity or opportunity for workers to be able to work in more
than one company will encourage unequal distribution of income or wealth. For Rawls' theory, everyone has the
same right to be rich, not the right to have the same wealth.


Download data is not yet available.


Ackerman, B. (2017). Private Property and the Constitution. Yale University Press.

Ali, A. (2009). Menguak Teori Hukum (legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicial Prudence) termasuk Interpretasi Undang-undang (Legisprudende),Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta

Bosco, R. E. (2003). Hukum Responsif, Pilihan di Masa Transisi, Jakarta : Perkumpulan untuk Pembaharuan Hukum Berbasis Masyarakat dan Ekologis (Hu Ma)

Bridgstock, R. (2009). The graduate attributes we’ve overlooked: enhancing graduate employability through career management skills. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 31–44.

Cavanagh, J., Burston, M., Southcombe, A., & Bartram, T. (2015). Contributing to a graduate-centred understanding of work readiness: An exploratory study of Australian undergraduate students’ perceptions of their employability. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(3), 278–288.

Chalmers, D., MacKenzie, N. G., & Carter, S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Entrepreneurship: Implications for Venture Creation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 1028–1053.

Hasudungan, A. N. (2021). Pengunaan Buku Teks Sejarah Indonesia pada Satuan Pendidikan Menengah atas dalam Kurikulum 2013. Journal Education and Learning, 1(1), 12–19.

Hasudungan, A. N., Sariyatun, Joebagio, H., & Sartika, L. D. (2020). TRANSFORMASI KEARIFAN LOKAL PELA GANDONG DARI RESOLUSI KONFLIK HINGGA PENDIDIKAN PERDAMAIAN DI MALUKU. Fikri: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 5(1), 37–50.

Hill, M. A., Overton, T. L., Thompson, C. D., Kitson, R. R. A., & Coppo, P. (2019). Undergraduate recognition of curriculum-related skill development and the skills employers are seeking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 68–84.

Hurst, JW. (1971). Problem of Legitimacy in Contemporer Legal Order, Oklahoma Law Review


K. Zervoudi, E. (2020). Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities, Challenges, and Proposed Policies. In Industrial Robotics - New Paradigms. IntechOpen.

Kaur, N., & Kaur, A. (2021). Capitalist agriculture, COVID‐19 and agrarian labour relations in Punjab, India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 21(3), 638–650.

Kristiyanti, M., & Oktavia, A. (2021). Information Technology Readiness Towards the Industrial Revolution 4 . 0 in the Maritime Sector. Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovation in Science and Technology (ICIST 2020), 208(Icist 2020), 6–9.

Lukitaningsih, Hasudungan, A. N., & Nababan, S. A. (2022). MAMA PAPUA’S ROLE IN THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC SOCIETY: CASE STUDY OF THE DANI TRIBE IN JAYAWIJAYA REGENCY, PAPUA, INDONESIA. Revista Direito e Sexualidade (RevDirSex), 3(1), 167–182.

Manullang, E. F. (2007). Menggapai Hukum Berkeadilan, Kompas, Jakarta

Min, J., Kim, Y., Lee, S., Jang, T.-W., Kim, I., & Song, J. (2019). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Its Impact on Occupational Health and Safety, Worker’s Compensation and Labor Conditions. Safety and Health at Work, 10(4), 400–408.

Nababan, S. A., Sumantri, P., Tanjung, Y., & Hasudungan, A. N. (2022). Student ’ s Coaching During the Covid-19 Pandemic in the SMAN 1 Rupat : National Science Competition in 2021. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR), 1(2), 175–184.

Nonet, P & Selznik, P. (1978). Hukum Responsif, Yogyakarta : Nusamedia

Raharjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum, Bandung : PT Citra Aditya Bakti

Rawls, J. (2006). Teori Keadilan, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogjakarta

Reiff, M. R. (2012). The Difference Principle, Rising Inequality, and Supply-Side Economics: How Rawls Got Hijacked by the Right. Revue de Philosophie Économique, Vol. 13(2), 119–173.

Satya, V. E. (2018). Strategi Indonesia Menghadapi Industri 4.0, Jurnal Info Singkat, Vol. X, No. 09/I/Puslit/Mei/2018

Slowinski, G., & Sagal, M. W. (2010). Good Practices in Open Innovation. Research-Technology Management, 53(5), 38–45.

Sweeney, A., Clarke, N., & Higgs, M. (2019). Shared Leadership in Commercial Organizations: A Systematic Review of Definitions, Theoretical Frameworks and Organizational Outcomes. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(1), 115–136.

Taryono, Purnomosidi, A., & Riyanti, R. (2019). PERLINDUNGAN BAGI PEKERJA DI ERA REVOLUSI INDUSTRI 4.0 DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL PANCASILA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hukum Transendental 2019, 47–56.

Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 530–535.

Yang, F., & Gu, S. (2021). Industry 4.0, a revolution that requires technology and national strategies. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(3), 1311–1325.




How to Cite

Jumiati, A. ., & Slamet Pradoto, W. . (2022). Changing Patterns Of Industrial Relationships In The Responsive And Justice Era Of The Industrial Revolution 4.0. International Journal of Educational Research &Amp; Social Sciences, 3(4), 1341–1347.