Changing Patterns Of Industrial Relationships In The Responsive  And Justice Era Of The Industrial Revolution 4.0

Agatha  Jumiati; Waluyo  Slamet Pradoto

doi:10.51601/ijersc.v3i4.422

Authors

Agatha Jumiati Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta, Indonesia
Waluyo Slamet Pradoto Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i4.422

Keywords:

Industrial Relations Patterns, Industrial Revolution 4.0, Responsive Law and Justice

Abstract

The Industrial Revolution 4.0 in the industrial sector has brought changes, one of which is a change concerning
the pattern of industrial relations between workers and employers. The pattern of industrial relations before the
Industrial Revolution 4.0 was a pattern of relationships based on work agreements. While the pattern of industrial
relations after the Industrial Revolution 4.0 underwent a change where the pattern of industrial relations created
was based on partnership relations. The pattern of industrial relations based on partnership relations creates an
equal or equal relationship and not a multilevel relationship. From the perspective of responsive law, it views the
law as an inseparable part of the social world that surrounds it so that the law is not only truly functional and
useful in serving the community but is also able to respond to the aspirations and social needs to be served. In a
responsive legal order, law is a social institution. Therefore, law is not only seen as a mere regulatory system, but
also how the law carries out social functions in and for society. From the perspective of the Theory of Justice
presented by John Rawls, it can be concluded that the changing pattern of industrial relations in the Industrial
Revolution 4.0 era is in line with the basic principles of justice, namely the principle of freedom and the principle
of distribution of income or wealth. This can be reflected in the freedom to draw up work agreements to be made
between workers and employers. Besides, the opportunity or opportunity for workers to be able to work in more
than one company will encourage unequal distribution of income or wealth. For Rawls' theory, everyone has the
same right to be rich, not the right to have the same wealth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackerman, B. (2017). Private Property and the Constitution. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300158069

Ali, A. (2009). Menguak Teori Hukum (legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicial Prudence) termasuk Interpretasi Undang-undang (Legisprudende),Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta

Bosco, R. E. (2003). Hukum Responsif, Pilihan di Masa Transisi, Jakarta : Perkumpulan untuk Pembaharuan Hukum Berbasis Masyarakat dan Ekologis (Hu Ma)

Bridgstock, R. (2009). The graduate attributes we’ve overlooked: enhancing graduate employability through career management skills. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444347

Cavanagh, J., Burston, M., Southcombe, A., & Bartram, T. (2015). Contributing to a graduate-centred understanding of work readiness: An exploratory study of Australian undergraduate students’ perceptions of their employability. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2015.07.002

Chalmers, D., MacKenzie, N. G., & Carter, S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Entrepreneurship: Implications for Venture Creation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 1028–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720934581

Hasudungan, A. N. (2021). Pengunaan Buku Teks Sejarah Indonesia pada Satuan Pendidikan Menengah atas dalam Kurikulum 2013. Journal Education and Learning, 1(1), 12–19. http://jurnal.medanresourcecenter.org/index.php/EL/article/view/11

Hasudungan, A. N., Sariyatun, Joebagio, H., & Sartika, L. D. (2020). TRANSFORMASI KEARIFAN LOKAL PELA GANDONG DARI RESOLUSI KONFLIK HINGGA PENDIDIKAN PERDAMAIAN DI MALUKU. Fikri: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 5(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v5i1.784

Hill, M. A., Overton, T. L., Thompson, C. D., Kitson, R. R. A., & Coppo, P. (2019). Undergraduate recognition of curriculum-related skill development and the skills employers are seeking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00105G

Hurst, JW. (1971). Problem of Legitimacy in Contemporer Legal Order, Oklahoma Law Review

Irawan, A. D. (2020). NATIONALISM IN A STATE BASED ON PANCASILA. PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH, 5(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v5i2.85

K. Zervoudi, E. (2020). Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities, Challenges, and Proposed Policies. In Industrial Robotics - New Paradigms. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90412

Kaur, N., & Kaur, A. (2021). Capitalist agriculture, COVID‐19 and agrarian labour relations in Punjab, India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 21(3), 638–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12428

Kristiyanti, M., & Oktavia, A. (2021). Information Technology Readiness Towards the Industrial Revolution 4 . 0 in the Maritime Sector. Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovation in Science and Technology (ICIST 2020), 208(Icist 2020), 6–9. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icist-20/125965039

Lukitaningsih, Hasudungan, A. N., & Nababan, S. A. (2022). MAMA PAPUA’S ROLE IN THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC SOCIETY: CASE STUDY OF THE DANI TRIBE IN JAYAWIJAYA REGENCY, PAPUA, INDONESIA. Revista Direito e Sexualidade (RevDirSex), 3(1), 167–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9771/revdirsex.v3i1.47693

Manullang, E. F. (2007). Menggapai Hukum Berkeadilan, Kompas, Jakarta

Min, J., Kim, Y., Lee, S., Jang, T.-W., Kim, I., & Song, J. (2019). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Its Impact on Occupational Health and Safety, Worker’s Compensation and Labor Conditions. Safety and Health at Work, 10(4), 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2019.09.005

Nababan, S. A., Sumantri, P., Tanjung, Y., & Hasudungan, A. N. (2022). Student ’ s Coaching During the Covid-19 Pandemic in the SMAN 1 Rupat : National Science Competition in 2021. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR), 1(2), 175–184. https://journal.formosapublisher.org/index.php/eajmr/article/view/86

Nonet, P & Selznik, P. (1978). Hukum Responsif, Yogyakarta : Nusamedia

Raharjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum, Bandung : PT Citra Aditya Bakti

Rawls, J. (2006). Teori Keadilan, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogjakarta

Reiff, M. R. (2012). The Difference Principle, Rising Inequality, and Supply-Side Economics: How Rawls Got Hijacked by the Right. Revue de Philosophie Économique, Vol. 13(2), 119–173. https://doi.org/10.3917/rpec.132.0119

Satya, V. E. (2018). Strategi Indonesia Menghadapi Industri 4.0, Jurnal Info Singkat, Vol. X, No. 09/I/Puslit/Mei/2018

Slowinski, G., & Sagal, M. W. (2010). Good Practices in Open Innovation. Research-Technology Management, 53(5), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2010.11657649

Sweeney, A., Clarke, N., & Higgs, M. (2019). Shared Leadership in Commercial Organizations: A Systematic Review of Definitions, Theoretical Frameworks and Organizational Outcomes. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(1), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12181

Taryono, Purnomosidi, A., & Riyanti, R. (2019). PERLINDUNGAN BAGI PEKERJA DI ERA REVOLUSI INDUSTRI 4.0 DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL PANCASILA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hukum Transendental 2019, 47–56. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/handle/11617/11266/5.pdf?sequence=1

Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006

Yang, F., & Gu, S. (2021). Industry 4.0, a revolution that requires technology and national strategies. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(3), 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00267-9