Improving Students’ Academic Achievement in 2nd Year Horticulture Students
Keywords:knowledge, peer, organizations, sampling
Peer learning is underpinned by social constructivist learning theory. Collaborative peer learning is a means of preparing learners to become independent and actively involved in constructing knowledge for themselves and understanding how to use it. The objectives of The study was to distinguish the major problems that affect the implementation of peer learning in the department and to find and apply possible strategies that help to improve student’s academic this study was achievement used two stage sampling. Methods in the first stage 2nd year horticulture students were selected, and then random sampling method was applied. The study identified that, unequal sharing of tasks among group members, Problem of group organization/formation, lack of students’ a preparation were the major problems
Anwar Ahmed, Sisay Awgichew and Tamirat Zelalem. 2016. Teachers Professional Commitment towards
Students Learning, their Profession and the Community in Eastern Ethiopian Secondary Schools. Journal of
Teacher Education and Educators, 5(3):289-314.
Arendale, D. (1993). Foundation and theoretical framework for supplemental instruction. In D.C. Martin & D.
Arendale (Eds.). Supplemental instruction: Improving first‐year student success in high‐risk courses, 2nd ed. (pp.
‐26). Monograph Series Number 7. Columbia SC: The National Resource Center for the First Year Experience
Battle, J. and Lewis, M. (2002). The increasing significance of class: The relative effects of race and
socioeconomic status on academic achievement. Journal of Poverty, 6(2), 21-35.
Bereiter, C. (2002) Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brandon, David P., & Hollingshead, Andrea B. (1999). Collaborative Learning and Computer-Supported
Groups. Communication Education, 48, 109-126
Brophy, J. (2002) Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints. Oxford, Elsevier Science Ltd.
Cheng, W., &Warren, M. (2000). Making a difference: using peers to assess individual students’ contributions to
Cockrell, K., Donaldson, J. & Caplow, J. (2000). A context for learning: Collaborative grouping in the problembased learning environment. The Review of Higher Education,23(3), 347-363.
Farzaneh, N and Nejadansari, D. 2014.Learning for Teaching
Reading Comprehension. Journal of Theory and practice in language studies, 4(2,):2 87-292.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1992). Implementing cooperative learning. Contemporary there is no age bar
for Education, 63(3), 173-181
Levine, H. M., Glass, G. V., & Meister, G. R. (1987). A cost-effectiveness analysis of computer assiste
dinstruction. Evaluation Review, 11,50–72.
Mercer, N. (1996) The quality of tal classroom, Learning and Instruction, 6, 359-377.
Muhammed Kedir. 2012. Cooperative Learning Practices in College of Education and Behavioral Sciences in
Haramaya University, Ethiopia. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR),3(11).
Piaget, J. 1972. The Psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Prawat, R. S. 1996. Constructivisms, modern and postmodern. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 215‐225.
Tarim, Kamuran; Akdeniz, Fikri. 2008. The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Turkish Elementary Students'
Mathematics Achievement and Attitude towards Mathematics Using TAI and STAD Methods, Educational
Studies in Mathematics, v67 n1 p77-91.
Tebabal A, Kahssay, G 2011. The effects of student-centered approach in improving students' graphical
interpretation skills and conceptual understanding of kinematical motion. Latin Amer. J. Phys. Educ. 5(2):374-
Topping, K. J. 2001. Peer assisted learning: A practical guide for teachers. Cambridge, MA:Brookline Books
Topping, K. J., &Ehly, S. 1998. Peer-assisted learning.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.