Implementation Of Bureaucracy Simple Policy In Improving The Bureaucracy Reform Index The Government Of The City Of Salatiga


  • Hari Priyono Diponegoro University, Indonesia
  • Hardi Warsono Diponegoro University, Indonesia
  • Retno Sunu Astuti Diponegoro University, Indonesia



Bureaucratic Simplification Policy, Bureaucratic Reform Index.


The targets of the Salatiga City Government Bureaucratic Reform are adjusted to the development targets of the
state apparatus sub-sector, as stated in Presidential Regulation Number 18 of 2020 concerning the 2020-2024
National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN), namely: a clean and accountable bureaucracy; capable
bureaucracy; and excellent public service. This research uses the descriptive qualitative method. Qualitative
research is research where the researcher is placed as a key instrument, the data collection technique is carried
out by combining and analyzing the data and is inductive in nature. This research will use an inductive mindset,
namely, the researcher goes into the field, studies a process of discovery which is a fact or event, and then
records it. , analyze with a phenomenological approach then interpret and report and draw conclusions from
the process.The result of his research was that the Mayor of Salatiga requested that the implementation of
Bureaucratic Reform be followed up immediately. Digital signatures are expected to encourage effective and
efficient bureaucratic processes. Public service problems include people's dissatisfaction with the time, cost,
and method of service. The implementation of Bureaucratic Reform covers eight areas of change. In Salatiga,
there are several assessment indices that have decreased in 2021. "No less important is how to use one data to
synergize with each other," is the application of digital signatures to ensure the authenticity and transparency of
documents. Digital signatures are expected to encourage effective and efficient bureaucratic processes, without
reducing the accountability factor for document changes that occur. The mayor said the bureaucratic flow is
getting better so that public services can be of higher quality.


Download data is not yet available.


Didin S, dkk. (2014). Masalah dan Kebijakan Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia. Bogor: Penerbit IPB Press.

Habsul Nurhadi. (2017). No Title Реформа закупок. Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani,

(3), 137–148.

Haerul, Haedar Akib, H. (2016). Implementasi Kebijakan Program Makassar Tidak Rantasa (Mtr) Di Kota

Makassar. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 6(2), 21–34.

Kasim, A. (2013). Bureaucratic Reform and Dynamic Goernance for Combating Corruption: The Challenge for

Indonesia. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 20(1).

Khairi, Halilul. (2021). Organisasi Sektor Publik. Pekalongan: Nasya Expanding Management.

Krisnajaya, I. M., Suripto, Dewi, N. P., Sulistiyani, A. T., & Laksana, L. U. A. (2019). The Political Process of

Bureaucratic Reform: Wonosobo Regional Government Experience from 2011-2015. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan

Ilmu Politik, 23(2), 135–149.

Mcleod, R. (2005). The struggle to regain effective government under democracy in Indonesia. Bulletin of

Indonesian Economic Studies, 41(3), 367–386.

Metera, I. G. M. (2020). Reformasi Birokrasi Pemerintah Kabupaten Buleleng, Tanpa Whistleblowing System.

Locus Majalah Ilmiah FISIP, 12(1), 101–119.

International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

M. Muiz R. (2021). Mendalami Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil Dari Peraturannya. Bogor: Guepedia.

Nurhestitunggal, M., & Muhlisin, M. (2020). Penyederhanaan Struktur Birokrasi: Sebuah Tinjauan Perspektif

Teoretis dan Empiris Pada Kebijakan Penghapusan Eselon III dan IV.Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan Daerah,

(1), 1–20.

Nurprojo, I. S. (2014). Merit System dan Politik Birokrasi di Era Otonomi Daerah.Jurnal Kebijakan Dan

Manajemen PNS, 8(1), 45–52.

Park, S. (2019). Dusk for the pyramid-shaped bureaucracy: examining the shape of the U.S. federal bureaucracy

in the twenty first century. Quality and Quantity, 53(3), 1565–1585.

Prabowo, T. J. W. (2018). Reforms in public sector accounting and budgeting in Indonesia (2003-2015):

Confusions in implementation. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 30(1),


Prastowo, Andi. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Perspektif Rancangan Penelitian. Yogyakarta: ArRuzz Media.

Pratama, A. B. (2017). Bureaucracy Reform Deficit in Indonesia: A Cultural Theory Perspective. Journal of

Public Administration and Governance, 7(3), 88.

Rewansyah, A. (2010). Reformasi birokrasi dalam rangka good governance. Jakarta: Yusaintanas Prima.

Ridwan, D. P. (2018). Reformasi Birokrasi Polri Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Pada

Kepolisian Daerah Sulawesi Selatan. AKMEN Jurnal Ilmiah, 15(3), 460–475.

Sawir, M. (2019). Tinjauan Mengenai Fungsi Birokrasi Pemerintahan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi

Dan Ilmu Pemerintahan, 3(1), 208–221.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung:Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung:Alfabeta.

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia.

Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351.




How to Cite

Priyono, H. ., Warsono, H. ., & Sunu Astuti, R. . (2022). Implementation Of Bureaucracy Simple Policy In Improving The Bureaucracy Reform Index The Government Of The City Of Salatiga. International Journal of Educational Research &Amp; Social Sciences, 3(4), 1513–1526.