Management Of Teacher Pedagogic Competency Development In Improving Teacher Performance Productive Network Computer Engineering (Case Study Of SMKS Kosgoro and SMKS Nusantara Bogor City)
Keywords:Management coaching, pedagogical competence and performance of productive teachers of Computer Network Engineering.
This research is motivated by the implementation of pedagogic competence development in general has not been
able to improve its quality because it does not yet have a superior quality culture. This study aims to determine the
implementation of the management of teacher pedagogical competence development in an effort to improve their
performance. The theories in this research are: management theory, coaching (empowerment), competence,
performance and six value systems. This study uses a descriptive exploratory method with a qualitative approach
to the type of case study that focuses on one particular object as a case and makes general conclusions based on
scientific facts. The results of the research in general have obtained an overview of the implementation of
management of pedagogic competence development in an effort to improve its performance. Specifically, it is
concluded that: (1) Planning for teacher competency development to improve teacher pedagogic competence has
a 5-year program formulation and an annual coaching program. (2) The organization of teacher competency
development to improve teacher pedagogic competence is prepared by the School Team, consisting of school
principals, vice principals and heads of the Computer Network Engineering program. (3) Implementation of
teacher competency development to improve teacher pedagogic competence is sometimes not in accordance with
the programmed schedule/time and established procedures, as well as operational cost constraints. (4)
Supervision of teacher competency development to improve teacher pedagogic competence has been carried out
by the Head by recommending suggestions to teachers to make follow-up plans, (5) Factors that support teacher
competency development to improve teacher pedagogic competence are good activity planning according to the
program and objectives; high enthusiasm and passion for the profession. As for the obstacles in the
implementation of the development of pedagogical competence include: a) Lack of competent teachers; b)
productive teachers of Network Computer Engineering have not fully utilized the data obtained from the
coaching; and c) productive teachers of Network Computer Engineering have not carried out their duties
according to their duties and responsibilities. (6) Efforts made to overcome obstacles and obstacles in the
implementation of teacher pedagogical competence development to improve the performance of productive
teachers in Networking Computer Engineering are: a) maintaining communication always connected and
monitoring more intensely, b) Principal recommending the results of coaching to the Foundation , c) sharing good
practices of knowledge and experience with other productive teachers; and d) Utilizing information technology in
the form of applications and social media to facilitate the implementation of coaching. The research product of
the hypothetical model is depicted in a schematic diagram and its explanation.
Akmal, Hawi. 2013. Kompetensi Guru Penddikan Agama Islam. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Amini. Profesi Keguruan. Medan: Perdana Publishing. 2013.
Arikunto, S. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Danim, Sudarwan. 2002. Menjadi Peneliti Kualitatif . Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta : Depdiknas.
Engkoswara. 2001. Paradigma Manajemen Pendidikan. Menyongsong Otonomi Daerah. Bandung. Yayasan
Hawi, Akmal. 2013. Kompetensi Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.
Imron, Ali. 1995. Pembinaan Guru di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Kasmir. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori dan Praktik), Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Moleong. Lexy J. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyasa, E. 2003. Standar Kompetensi & Sertifikat Guru. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nawawi, Hadari. 2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Bisnis yang Kompetitif, Gajah Mada
University Press, Yogyakarta.
Robbins, Stephen P. 1984. Management, Concept and Practice. Prentice Hall. New Jersey.
Satori, Djaman. 2007. Profesi Keguruan. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Torang, Syamsir. 2013. Organisasi dan Manajemen (Perilaku, Struktur, Budaya & Perubahan Organisasi.
Uno, Hamzah B. Model Pembelajaran (Menciptakan Proses Belajar Mengajar yang Kreatif dan Efektif), Bumi
Wibowo. 2013. Perilaku dalam Organisasi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Huang, H.-I., & Lee, C.-F. (2012). Strategic management for competitive advantage: a case study of higher
technical and vocational education in Taiwan. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(6),
Khairuddin, N.M. (2011). Pengaruh Ragam Kecerdasan dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Guru Sekolah
Menengah Atas. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen Vol. 91 Nomor 31 Mei 2011.
Rangkuti, NA. 2014. Konstruktivisme Dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Darul ‘Ilmi Vol. 02, No. 02 Juli
Sunaryo. 2009. Peningkatan Kemampuan dan Kreativitas Guru dalam Proses Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar di
Kelas. Jurnal Mimbar Pendidikan. No.2/XXVIII/2009.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.