The Role Of Religious Morals On Students' Academic Cheating Behavior During Online Learning During The Covic-19 Period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i5.504Abstract
Cheating behavior is a dishonest act carried out by someone in order
to get a satisfactory end result. Academic cheating is still often done
by students, to get high grades. The emergence of a feeling of worry
or feeling threatened that is felt because of the inability or less than
optimal of a student in completing his college assignments triggers
students to commit academic fraud due to various demands from the
environment that expect high results and grades. This study aims to
determine the effect of academic integrity factors and religious moral
factors on student academic cheating during online learning during
the Covid-19 period at Prof. University. Dr. Moestopo (Religious)
Academic Year 2021-2022 even.The sample method used is purposive
sampling. The number of students who were sampled in this study
were 350 students of Prof. University. Dr. Moestopo (Religious), Even
Semester. The data used is primary data in the form of questionnaires
distributed to respondents using google form facilities. This analysis
method uses descriptive statistical tests, data quality tests, classical
assumption tests, data analysis tests and model suitability tests using
the SPSS program.The results showed that religious moral factors
and academic integrity had a significant effect on students' academic
cheating behavior. Partially, this study shows that religious moral
factors have a negative and significant effect, while academic
integrity factors have a positive and significant effect on academic
cheating behavior in the online learning system.
Downloads
References
Abdul Mujib, Kepribadian dalam Psikologi Islam (Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada 2006), h. 185 – 187.
Azizah, N. (2015). Perilaku Moral dan Religiusitas Siswa Berlatar Belakang Pendidikan Umum dan Agama.
Jurnal Psikologi, 33(2), 1–16.
Ancok, D. dan Suroso, F. N. 2011. Psikologi Islami: Solusi Islam atas Problem- problem Psikologi. Yogyakarta:
Pustaka Pelajar.
Anderman E. M. dan Murdock T. B. 2007. Psychology of Academic Cheating. London : Academic Press, Inc.
Angel, L. R. 2004. The relationship of impulsiveness, personal efficacy, and academic motivation to college
cheating. The college Student Journal, 38, 118-131
Bali, Markus Masan, 2013. Peran Dosen Dalam Mengembangkan Karakter Mahasiswa, HUMANIORA Vol.4
No.2 Oktober 2013: 800-810
Barnard, A., Schurink, W., Beer, M.D. 2008. A Conceptual Framework of Integrity. SA Journal of Industrial
Psychology.Vol. 34. No. 2 (40-49)
Buana, Z. P., & Soetjiningsih, C. H. (2020). Penalaran Moral Dan Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa
Yang Sedang Mengerjakan Skripsi. Jurnal Psikologi Perseptual, 4(1), 65.
https://doi.org/10.24176/perseptual.v4i1.2271
Carpenter, Donald D.; Harding, Trevor S.; Finelli, Cynthia J. 2006. The implications of academic dishonesty in
undergraduate engineering on professional ethical behavior, diakses dari https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu
]Cardina, Y., & Sangka, K. B. (2021). Kecurangan Akademik (Academic Fraud) Pada Pembelajaran Daring.
Prosiding Seminar Nasional …, 1(PGSD), 27–35.
wnload/8/4
Departemen Agama R.I., Al-Qur’an Terjemah (Jakarta: Al-Huda Kelompok Gema Insani,2005), h. 512.
Emmerton, Jiang, H., L., & McKauge, L. 2013. Academic integrity and plagiarism: a review of the influences
and risk situations for health students. Higher Education Research &Development. Retrieved from
http://www.tandfonline. com/doi/abs/10.1080/ 07294360.2012.687362
Harefa. (2000). Integritas Akademik. Diakses pada 25 Juli 2022, dari
https://konsultasiskripsi.com/2019/03/29/pengertian-integritas-akademik-skripsi-dan-tesis/ Hasibuan dan
Moedjiono. (2012). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Higbee, J. L., & Thomas, P. V., 2002. Student and faculty perceptions of behaviors that constitute cheating.
NASPA Journal, 40(1), 39-52
Imam Malik Syafi’I et al, 2020. Pengertian Iman Menurut Istilah. Diakses pada 05 Agustus 2022 ]
manan.
Karim, Abdul. (2013). Islam Nusantara, Yogyakarta: Gama Media.
Kuning, A. H. (2018). Takwa dalam Islam. Jurnal Istiqra’, 6(1), 103–110.
Kusuma, M. F. D. (2018). FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI MAHASISWA MELAKUKAN
TINDAKAN KECURANGAN AKADEMIK DENGAN PERSPEKTIF FRAUD DIAMOND DAN
RELIGIUSITAS (STUDI PADA MAHASISWA AKUNTANSI UNIVERSITAS ISLAM INDONESIA). Jurnal
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406
Ekonomi, 3(2). https://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/7739/Skripsi_Muhammad Faisal Dwi
Kusuma 14 312 502 PDF.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Margaretha, Purwanti. (2021). Hubungan Antara Quality of Life dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa SMA/Sederajat di
Jakarta Selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19, diakses dari https://doi.org/10.25170/manasa.v10i2.2907
McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K.D., & Trevino, L. K., (2001). Cheating in Academic In Decade of Research.
Ethics and Behaviour, 11(3), 219-232
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., dan Butterfield, K. D. 2009. Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences on
Academic Integrity: A Replication and Extension of Modified Honor Code Settings. Research in Higher
Education, 43(3), 357-378
Mitchell, T. & Carroll, J., 2008. Academic and research misconduct in the Ph.D: Issues for students and
supervisors. Nurse Education Today: 28, 218-226, 2008.
Mutaqin. 2014. Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Projek untuk Meningkatkan
Soft Skill Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, Juni 2014, IV(3).
Muthia, S. (2021). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Niat Mahasiswa Akuntansi Untuk Melakukan Kecurangan
Akademik Pada Sistem Pembelajaran Daring/Online. 1996, 6.
Purnamasari, D. (2013). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa.
Educational Psychology Journal. Vol. 2, No. 1, 13-21
Primaldhi, Alfindra, 2010. Perilaku plagiat pada mahasiswa s1 dari tiga universitas: prevalensi, faktor-faktor,
dan program intervensi, Thesis Magister Fakultas Psikologi UI
]Ridhuan, S. (2021). Mahasiswa Melalui Kontrol Moral-Agama Pada Pembelajaran Daring Masa Pandemi
Covid-19. Pendidikan, 18(2), 264–278.
Robert, C. J., & Hai-Jew, S. 2009. Issues of academic integrity: an online course for students addressing
academic dishonesty. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5 (2), 182– 196.
Ronokusumo, S. (2012). Integritas Akademik, “Sekedar Kata atau Nyata?”. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas
Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia. (Robbert, n.d.)
Salim, Burhanuddin. 1997. Etika Sosial Asas Moral Dalam Kehidupan Manusia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Santrock. 2007. Remaja. Edisi 11 Jilid 2. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Sugiyono. (2015). Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Widhi, Ernayanti Nur, 2014. Makna Perilaku Jujur Berani Jujur Itu Hebat: Dalam Aktivitas Akademik, Tesis
Psikologi UGM
Wood, Gail and Warnken, Paula. 2004. Managing Technology, Academic Original Sin: Plagiarism, the Internet,
and Librarians. Journal of Academic Librarianship, May2004, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p237-242
Wulandari, Antonina Pantja Juni, 2012. Gambaran Kejujuran Sebagai Landasan Keutamaan Moral Mahasiswa
Yang Sudah Pernah Mengambil Mata Kuliah Character Building, Humaniora Vol.3 No.2 Oktober 2012: 566-572
Wulandari, Antonina Pantja Juni, 2012. Gambaran Kejujuran Sebagai Landasan Keutamaan Moral Mahasiswa
Yang Sudah Pernah Mengambil Mata Kuliah Character Building, Humaniora Vol.3 No.2 Oktober 2012: 566-572
Zazuli, Mohammad, 2009,60 Tokoh Dunia Sepanjang Masa, Narasi, Yogyakarta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
