Implementation Of Education Quality Assurance System To Improve Internal Quality Assurance Department Of Family Welfare Education (PKK) Universitas Negeri Medan

Authors

  • Fatma Tresno Ingtyas Lecturer at Universitas Negeri Medan Department Of Family Welfare Education (Pkk), Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Dina Ampera Lecturer at Universitas Negeri Medan Department Of Family Welfare Education (Pkk), Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Siti Wahidah Lecturer at Universitas Negeri Medan Department Of Family Welfare Education (Pkk), Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Ismail Jahidin Lecturer at Universitas Negeri Medan Department Of Family Welfare Education (Pkk), Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i5.509

Keywords:

Quality Assurance, Internal Quality in the Department of Family Welfare Education (PKK)

Abstract

Quality assurance is a series of related processes and systems for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data on the
performance and quality of educators and education personnel, programs and institutions. The quality assurance process
identifies aspects of achievement and priority for improvement, provides data as a basis for planning and decision making
and helps build a culture of continuous improvement.This study aims to describe the implementation of the Internal Quality
Assurance System (SPMI) as an effort to improve the quality of education in the PKK Department, Faculty of Engineering,
Unimed. This study is a qualitative research with case study method. The research was conducted at the Department of
Family Welfare Education (PKK) Faculty of Engineering, Unimed, with the subject of the Department of Quality Assurance
Team (TPMJ PKK). Data collection techniques: direct observation, document and archive searches, and interviews. The
results showed: (1) TPMJ policies and concepts in the form of academic documents and quality documents were prepared
by TPMJ PKK; (2) TPMJ PKK as coordinator in planning and implementing learning in the PKK Department; (3) The
implementation of the TPMJ is carried out by preparing a design in the form of the TPMJ PKK Cycle; (4) Obstacles faced:
leadership commitment, number of auditors, TPMJ PKK activities become routine; (5) Steps to be taken: providing quality
assurance experts, building a spirit of quality assurance; (6) Evaluation of TPMJ PKK Implementation is carried out every
year; (7) Utilization of the results of TPMJ PKK implementation: building a culture of quality, accreditation; and (8)
Development of TPMJ PKK implementation refers to the standard management of BAN PT.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ditjen Dikti Depdiknas. (2003). Pedoman penjaminan mutu (quality assurance) pendidikan tinggi. Jakarta:

Ditjen Dikti Depdiknas.

Ditjen Dikti Depdiknas. (2004). Strategi jangka panjang pendidikan tinggi (HELTS) 2003-2010 menuju sinergi

kebijakan nasional. Jakarta: Ditjen Dikti Depdiknas.

Ditjen Dikti Kemendiknas. (2010). Sistem penjaminan mutu perguruan tinggi (SPM-PT). Jakarta: Ditjen Dikti

Kemendiknas.

Hedwig, R. & Polla, G. (2006). Model sistem penjaminan mutu dan proses penerapannya di perguruan tinggi.

Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu Kemendiknas. (2009).

Permendiknas Nomor 63, Tahun 2009, tentang sistem penjaminan mutu pendidikan. Macdonald, J. (2005).

Understanding total quality management in a week, London: St Edmundsbury Press.

Markum, M.E. (2007). Pendidikan tinggi dalam perspektif sejarah dan perkembangannya di Indonesioa, Jakarta:

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Mishra, S. (2007). Quality assurance in higher education: An introduction, Bangalore, India: National

Assessment and Acreditation Council.

Oakland, J.S. (1995). Total quality management: The route to improving performance, London: ButterworthHeinemann Ltd.

Presiden. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 19, Tahun 2005, tentang standar nasional pendidikan.

Republik Indonesia.

International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

https://ijersc.org

Undang-undang RI Nomor 20, Tahun 2003, tentang sistem pendidikan nasional. Republik Indonesia. (2012).

Undang-undang Nomor 12, Tahun 2012, tentang pendidikan tinggi.

Reynolds, L. (1994). Beyond total quality management. Great Britian: Sheldon Press. Tampubolon, D.P. (2001).

Perguruan tinggi bermutu perguruan, paradigma baru manajemen pendidikan inggi menghadapi tantangan abad

Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Tellefsen, T.E. (1990). Improving college management: An integrated system approach. California: Jossey-Bass

Inc., Publishers.

Tjiptono, F. & Diana, A. (1995). Total quality management. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset. 32 − Jurnal

Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan Volume 4, No 1, April 2016 UNESCO. (2005).

Guidelines for quality provision in cross-border higher education. Paris: the United Nations Educational,

Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Wijatno, S. (2009). Pengelolaan perguruan tinggi secara efisien, efektif, dan ekonomis untuk meningkatkan mutu

penyelenggaraan pendidikan dan mutu lulusan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Worthen, H. & Berry, J. (2002). Bargaining for "Quality" in Higher Education: A Case Study from the City

Colleges of Chicago (Versi elektronik). Labor Studies Journal, 27, 1-23.

Yin, R.K. (2013). Case study reasearch: Design & methods. California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-28

How to Cite

Tresno Ingtyas, F. ., Ampera, D. ., Wahidah, S. ., & Jahidin, I. . (2022). Implementation Of Education Quality Assurance System To Improve Internal Quality Assurance Department Of Family Welfare Education (PKK) Universitas Negeri Medan. International Journal of Educational Research &Amp; Social Sciences, 3(5), 1886–1896. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i5.509