Development Of An Instrument For Assessment Of Creative Thinking Skills Based On Collaborative Problem Based Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.635Abstract
Learning model Collaborative Problem Based Learning (CPBL) has the potential to
improve students' creative thinking skills by providing collaborative learning and
students are trained in how to solve problems that are very close to their lives. To find
out the students' creative thinking skills, standard, valid, and reliable CPBL- oriented
assessment instruments are needed. In connection with the description of the thoughts
and research results above, the general objective of this study: to develop an
assessment instrument for creative thinking skills and the feasibility of the developed
assessment instrument. The validation results show that the creative thinking skills
assessment instrument has a score of 3.67-4.00 with a very valid category. The results
of the reliability test showed that the instrument for assessing creative thinking skills
had a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.864 in a very strong category.
Downloads
References
Akdon, R. (2012). Formulas and Data in Statistical Applications. Alphabet.
Arends, R. (2012). Learning to Teach (Tenth). McGrawHill Education.
Blascova, M. (2014). Influencing Academic Motivation, Responsibility and Creativity. Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 415 – 425.
Brown, S., & Walter, M. (2005). The Art Of Problem Posing (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Publishers.
Chandra, R. (2015). Collaborative Learning for Educational Achievement. Journal of Research & Method in
Education (IOSR-JRME), 5(3), 2320–7388.
Cohen, L., & Ambrose, D. (1999). Adaptation & creativity. Encyclopedia of Creativity, 1, 9–22.
Coll, R., & Taylor, N. (2002). Mental Models in Chemistry: Senior Chemistry Students. Mental Models of
Chemical Boding. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 3(2), 175–184.
Fardah, D. K. (2012). Process Analysis and Students’ Creative Thinking Ability in Mathematics Through
Open-Ended Assignments. Kreano Journal, 3(2).
Griffin, P., Care, E., & Harding, S. (2015). Task Characteristics and Calibration in Assessment and Teaching
of 21st Century Skills. Methods and Approaches (P. Griffin & E. Care (eds.)). Springer Science and Business
Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7
Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative
problem solving skills (P. Griffin & E. Care (eds.)). Springer Science and Business Media.
Kang, M., Kim, M., Kim, B., & You, H. (2012). Developing an Instrument to Measure 21st Century Skills for
Elementary Student. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodolocy Studies, 25(2).
Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
e. The truth of the concept in question 4 4 4 4
f. The arrangement of sentences communicative matter 4 4 4 4
g. Sentence use language which is good and true 4 3 4 3.67
h. Arrangement of sentences does not generate double interpretation 4 4 4 4
a. Suitability question with subs Theory learning 4 4 4 4
b. Appropriate question with question indicators 4 4 4 4
c. Appropriateness of questions with skills creative thinking 4 4 4 4
d. Problem reflects tested concept 4 4 4 4
e. The truth of the concept in question 4 4 4 4
f. The arrangement of sentences communicative matter 4 4 4 4
g. Sentence use language which is good and true 4 3 4 4
h. Arrangement of sentences does not generate double interpretation 3 4 4 4
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406
Mayer, R., & Moreno, R. (2010). “Techniques that reduce extraneous cognitive load and manage intrinsic
cognitive load during multimedia learning,” inCognitive Load Theory (R. M. J.L Paas & R. Brünken (eds.)).
Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511844744.009
Mercier, E., & Higgins, S. (2014). Creating joint representations of collaborative problem solving with multitouch technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(6), 497–510.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12052
Skinner, V. J., Braunack-Mayer, A., & Winning, T. A. (2015). The purpose and value for students of PBL
groups for learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 9(1), 20–32.
Sugiyono. (2018). Educational Research Methods Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Approaches. Alphabet.
Torrance, E. (1995). Insights about creativity: Questioned, rejected, ridiculed, ignored. Educational
Psychology Review, 7, 313.
Tyas, R. (2017). Difficulties in Applying Problem Based Learning in Mathematics Learning. Tecnoscienza,
(1), 43–52.
Warsono. (2017). Active learning. Rosdakarya Youth.
Yuberti, Latifah, S., Anugrah, A., Saregar, A., Misbah, & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Approaching ProblemSolving Skills of Momentum and Impulse Phenomena Using Context and Problem-Based Learning. European
Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1217–1227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1217
Zainudin, M., & Istiyono, E. (2019). Scientific approach to promote response fluency viewed from social
intelligence: Is it effective? European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 801–808.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
