Legal Consequences of Marriage Agreement that is Made After The Marriage Exists for Husband and Wife Who Have Debts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v5i1.775Keywords:
Debts and Credits, Marriage and Marriage Agreement.Abstract
Marriage is a physical and mental bond between a man and a woman, hereinafter referred to as husband and wife. In marriage, there are married couples who make a marriage agreement. The Constitutional Court issued Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 which states that a marriage agreement can now be made after a marriage has taken place. Debt arising in a marriage is very possible, this can be done by both husband and wife. The result of this research is that liability cannot be asked of the husband and wife if the husband or wife does not first agree to a credit agreement with collateral for joint property. This type of research is normative research that uses a statutory approach and uses primary legal sources and secondary legal materials. The legal material analysis technique used is qualitative analysis, namely discussing the legal material that has been obtained by referring to the existing theoretical basis.
Downloads
References
Bintaranny, Kadek Megah., I Nyoman Putu Budiartha., I Wayan Arthanaya. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Bank Pada Perjanjian Kawin dalam Perkawinan Campuran. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 1(1), 37-43.
Fajar, Mukti dan Yulianto Achmad. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Normatif & Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Hadikusuma, Hilman. (2007). Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia: Menurut Perundangan, Hukum Adat dan Hukum Agama. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Hartanto, J. Andy. (2012). Hukum Harta Kekayaan Perkawinan (Menurut Burgerlijk Wetboek dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan). Yogyakarta: Laksbang Grafika.
Hermansyah. (2014). Hukum Perbankan Nasional Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Manan, Abdul. (2006). Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Mamudji, Sri. et al., (2005). Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2014). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Prawiroadmijojo, R.Soetojo. (2006). Pluralisme Dalam Perundang-undangan Perkawinan di Indonesia. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
Prayogo, Yunita., Efi Yulistyowati., Agus Saiful Abib. (2021). Implikasi Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebelum dan Sesudah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Terkait Harta Benda pada Perkawinan Campuran. Semarang Law Review (SLR), 2(2), 164-175.
Putri, P. Y., Djatmika, P., & Puspitawati, D. (2018). Implikasi Yuridis Perjanjian Perkawinan yang Dibuat Selama Dalam Ikatan Perkawinan Terhadap Utang Bersama Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015. Legality, 26(1), 95-117.
Saragih, Julius Martin., Yunanto., & Herni Widanarti. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Hutang-Hutang Persatuan Setelah Putusnya Perkawinan. Diponegoro Law Journal, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2017.15676 .
Subekti, R., R. Tjitrosudibyo. (1992). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Pradya Paramita.
Subekti, R. (1995). Aneka Perjanjian. Bandung: Intermasa.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
