Embracing Multimodality To Teach EFL Students: English Course Teachers’ Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v5i4.847Abstract
This article explores the Indonesian English course teachers’ perception on the use of multimodal teaching resources to enhance the learning experience of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. Multimodal resources, which integrate various modes of communication such as text, audio, visuals, and interactive elements, are designed to cater to different learning styles and preferences. The study highlights the benefits of multimodality, including increased student engagement, improved comprehension, etc. This study used qualitative research methodology to gain the teachers’ perception of multimodal teaching resources implementation. The participants were experienced English course teachers over three years teaching in the Ruang Guru platform. Furthermore, the researcher used semi-structured interviews to collect the data. Despite the advantages, the article also discusses the challenges associated with implementing multimodal resources, such as technological barriers and the time required for resource creation. The findings showed that teachers really understand the term of multimodal teaching resources before conducting it in their teaching and learning process. It found that the utilization of multimodal teaching resources has several advantages for teachers to support their teaching, however in preparing and using these multimodal resources, teachers encounter several obstacles and difficulties. By embracing multimodality and addressing these challenges, educators can create a more inclusive and effective learning environment for EFL students.
Downloads
References
Jayanti, E. D. & Damayanti, I. K. 2003. Exploring teachers’ perceptions of integrating multimodal literacy into English classrooms in Indonesian primary education. Child Education, 5 (2), 98-110.
Berliana, Novin. 2023. Multimodal analysis of English language teaching videos. Raden Intan State Islamic University: Lampung.
Ferstephanie, J. & Pratiwi, T. L. 2022. Teachers’ beliefs of using multimodal resources in teaching English skills. IDEAS: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10 (2), pp 1981-1998
Wara Wahyuningrum, D. ., Sumardi , S. ., & Setyaningsih, E. . (2024). Exploring Multimodal Text Practice among Junior High School EFL Teachers: A Case Study. International Journal of Educational Research &Amp; Social Sciences, 5(3), 420–429. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v5i3.810
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2015). Multimodality, Learning, and Communication: A social semiotic frame. Rutledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687537
Tandiana, S. T., Abdullah, F., Andriani, A., Hidayati, A. N., & Rosamala, D. 2024. The mapping multimodal teaching materials for undonesian EFL students: a need analysis. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 12 (2), pp. 147-168. DOI: 10.21580/vjv12i219990
Trisanti, N., Suherdi,D.,&Sukyadi, D.2022. Multimodality reflected in EFL teaching ,aterials:Indonesian EFL in-service teacher’s multimodality literacy perception.Language Circle:Journal of Language and Literature,17 (1).
Merriam, S. B., & Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: a guide to design and
implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Robinson, R. S. (2014). Purposive sampling. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia
of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 5243–5245). Springer Netherlands.
Hennink, M.,Hutter,I.,& Bailey,A.(2019).Qualitative research method s(2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Alamri, W. A. (2019). Effectiveness of qualitative research methods: interviews
and diaries. International Journal of English and Cultural Studies, 2(1), 65–70.
Mustofa, M. I., Riswanto, & Putra, P. P. Teachers’ orchestration of semiotic resources in EFL classrooms: A multimodal analysis. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 13 (2), pp. 552-580.
Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2021). Multimodal Texts in Disciplinary Education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.