The Status of Outside Marriage Children (The Study of Constitutional Court Regulation No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on February 27th, 2012 Based on the Fuqaha' Perspective)

Authors

  • Hamam Dosen Fakultas Shariah Prodi Hukum Keluarga, IAIN Jember, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v2i3.85

Keywords:

Constitutional Court Regulation, Jurists' Law

Abstract

Fornication is a kind of jarimah (felony) resulting in confusion of the biological father. However, nowadays, there is clarity on the status of the children out of marriage. The Constitutional Court issued a decision of regulation No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on February 27th, 2012 about the out wedlock children who have a civil relationship and the blood rapport with their biological father as long as it can be proven biologically. This regulation drives some criticisms from various parties; the pro-side of the Court Regulation will claim it in the term of the doer of the adultery, while the contra-side of the Court Regulation will review it in the term of legalized the adultery. Furthermore, the aims of this study are: First, to know the opinion of jurists' law (fuqaha‟) about the status of the out of wedlock children; Second, to find the legal implications of the out of wedlock children after the application of the Constitutional Court regulation No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on February 27th, 2012 based on the Fuqaha' perspective?. Moreover, this study uses the library research. The data are collected through the documentary of the primary and secondary data sources. The collected data are, then, analyzed qualitatively by using the content analysis. The results of this study are: Firstly, This according by the Shafi'i jurists' of four and the ad-Dzahiri the out of wedlock children (bastard) are not related to their biological father, but they are related to their biological mother and her family. Secondly, This according by some groups of Hanafi and Shaykh of Islam Ibn Taymiyah corroborated by ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyyah the wedlock children (bastard) are related to the men as their biological father and their father's family. Thirdly, the Constitutional Court (MK) regulations do not have any legal implications associated on the civil relationships of the out wedlock children (natural children) with their biological father. Moreover, the attitude of the biological father is classified as a jarimah (felony), and it is entitled to a penalty of the ta'zir; it is an obligation to provide the children, which the amount is considered to the fit and proper in accordance income of his; while the other civil rights includes the right of lineage, inheritance, and the rights of guardians. The ta'zir punishments in the provision of livelihood can be executed after the filing of a lawsuit and obtain an order from the Religion Court. The provision of the living is solely to satisfy the justice and legal protection for the interests of children's rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yusuf al-Qardawi, Halal dan Haram dalam Islam, Surabaya: PT Bina Ilmu, 1976, pp. 256

Wahbah al-Zuhaili, al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1997, pp. 114

Soerjono Soekanto, Pokok-pokok Sosiologi Hukum, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2012, pp. 89-90.

Syafran Sofyan, Analisis Hukum Putusan MK Nomor 46 /PUU-VIII/2010 tanggal 13 Februari 2012 tentang status anak lua kawin, Jakarta : Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional, tanggal 18-04-2012, pp. 2.

Heni Widanarti, Kedudukan Anka di Luar nikah di Indonesia, tinjauan Sosiologis, Semarang :Makalah Diskusi Bagian Hukum Keperdataan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, 1999, pp. 3

E-life: MUI: Anak Hasil Zina tak berhak menuntut ayahnya, Jakarta: Rabu,14 Maret 2012, pp.1

Lili Rasyidi dan Arif Sidharta, Filsafat Hukum Madzhab dan refleksinya, Bandung:Rosdakarya, 1997, 37

Muhammad Bin Idris as-Syafi’i, Ahkam al-Qur‟an, ditahqiq oleh Abdul ghani Abdul Khaliq, Beirut : Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 1980, pp. Juz Ii,

Abu Bakar Muhammad bin Abi Sahl al-Sarakhsi, al-Mabsuth, Beirut: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1978, Juz IV, 205

Burhanuddin Ibrahim bin Muhammad bin Abdillah bin Muhammad bin Muflih, al-Mubdi‟ Syarh al-Muqni‟, ditahqiq oleh Muhammad Hasan Ismail (Beirut : Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 1997), Juz VII, 70

Muhammad bin Abi Bakar, Zadu al-Ma’ad ditahqiq oleh Syu‟aib al-Arnu’uth dan Abdu al-Qadir al-arna’uthi Beirut : Mu’assatu al-Risalah, 1994, Juz V, 425.

Abdullah bin Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Qudamah al-Muqaddasi, al-Mughni Sharh Muhtashar al-Kharqi, Riyadh, Dar Alam al-Kutub, 1997, Juz IX, 123.

Zakiyuiddin Syaban, al-Ahkam as-Syariyyah li Ahwal as-Shahshiyyah, Kairo :Dar al-nahdhah al-Arabiyyah, 1969, 214.

Ibn Nuim. al-Bahru al-Roiiq syarh kanzu ad-Daqaiq (Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah, t.th) Juz III, 133. Al-Kasani, Bada’iu al-Shanaa’iu fi Tartib, Juz II, 250.

Ibn Nujaim, Zainuddin Ibn Nujaim Al Hanafi, Al Bahr Al Raiq, Beirut: Dar Al Ma‟rifah, tt, juz 3 pp. 117

Downloads

Published

2021-06-29

How to Cite

Hamam, H. (2021). The Status of Outside Marriage Children (The Study of Constitutional Court Regulation No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on February 27th, 2012 Based on the Fuqaha’ Perspective). International Journal of Educational Research &Amp; Social Sciences, 2(3), 574–584. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v2i3.85

Issue

Section

Articles