Forgery Of Deed Documents Between Indonesian And Dutch Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v5i5.887Abstract
Mail forgery has a wide-ranging and serious impact, not only on the individual victims, but also on social stability, security, and trust in the legal system and government. Mail forgery can include various types of documents, ranging from personal documents such as identity cards and passports, to official documents such as certificates, deeds, and financial documents. This research is normative research that studies the purpose of law, values of justice, validity of legal rules, legal concepts, and legal norms. The source materials used in this research are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Primary legal materials are the Indonesian Criminal Code and the Dutch Criminal Code. Furthermore, the data collected is analysed qualitatively. Indonesian law regulates related to the criminal offence of document forgery can be found in various laws. Among them are: Article 263 of the Criminal Code, Article 264 of the Criminal Code. In addition, Law Number 24 of 2013 concerning amendments to Law Number 23 of 2006 concerning population administration regulates the falsification of population documents such as KTP and birth certificates including deeds. As for the Dutch Legal Aspects, it specifically regulates Article 225 of the Dutch Criminal Code regarding forgery of all forms of documents that cause harm to others can be penalised and fined. The same as in Indonesia which regulates document forgery.
Downloads
References
. Abdillah, Satrio. “Batasan Kewenangan Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris-PPAT Dalam Edukasi Prosedur Pembuatan Akta Otentik Ditinjau Dari Pasal 51 KUHP.” Journal of Education Research 4, no. 1 (2023): 67–72. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i1.125.
. Abdillah, Satrio, and Roni Sahindra. “Spesialitas Notaris-PPAT Sebagai Profesi Dan Jabatan Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Specialties of Notary-PPAT as a Profession and Position In the Indonesian Legal System.” Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2022): 11–24.
. Baharuddin, Tawakkal, Zuly Qodir, and Mohammad Jafar Loilatu. “Government Website Performance during Covid-19 : Comparative Study Yogyakarta and South Sulawesi , Indonesia.” Journal of Governance and Public Policy 9, no. 2 (2022): 109–23. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v9i2.11474.
. Chen, Vivien. “Law and Society in the Evolution of Malaysia’s Islamic Capital Market Regulation.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 4, no. 1 (2017): 133– 56. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2016.20.
. Deen, Thaufiq, O. Argo Victoria, and Sumain Sumain. “Public Notary Services In Malaysia.” Jurnal Akta 5, no. 4 (2018): 1017. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i4.4135.
. Fileborn, Bianca, and F. Vera-Gray. “‘I Want to Be Able to Walk the Street Without Fear’: Transforming Justice for Street Harassment.” Feminist Legal Studies 25, no. 2 (2017): 203–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-017-9350- 3.
. Hofmann, Robin. “Formalism versus Pragmatism – A Comparative Legal and Empirical Analysis of the German and Dutch Criminal Justice Systems with Regard to Effectiveness and Efficiency.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 28, no. 4 (2021):452–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X211005983.
. Horowitz, Donald L. “The Qur’an and the Common aw: Islamic Law Reform and the Theory of Legal Change.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 42, no. 2 (1994): 233. https://doi.org/10.2307/840748.
. Husa, Jaakko. “Translating Legal Language and Comparative Law.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 30, no. 2 (2017): 261–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-016-9490-9.
. Hussy, Maharani Millenia, and Benny Djaja. “Comparison of Notary Law in Indonesia and Singapore.” Interdisciplinary Social Studies 2, no. 7 (2023): 2157–63.
. Itasari, Endah Rantau. “Fulfillment of Education Rights in the Border Areas of Indonesia and Malaysia.” Ganesha Law Review 1, no. 1 (2019): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.23887/glr.v1i1.14.
. Jaraputri, Rabi’ah Adawiyah Phonna Effendy, Sri Walny Rahayu, Mohd. Din, and Muhammad Suhail Ghifari. “Legal Consequences For A Notary Public With Double Professions As A Rector Of A Private University Based On Law On Office Of Notary Public.” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran 23, no. 1 (2023): 25–35. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v23i1.8611.
. Nordin, Rohaida, and Abdul Rahman Abdullah. “Human Rights, Its Scope and Application: An Empirical Analysis of Future Human Rights Advocates in Malaysia.” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 25, no. 2 (2017): 741–59.
. Nurliyantika, Rizka, Syahri Ramadhan, and Neisa Angrum Adisti. “Studi Komparasi Tugas Dan Wewenang Notaris Di Indonesia Dan Malaysia.” Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan 11, no. 2 (2022): 196– 207. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v11i2.2471.
. S, Eko Budi, and Wancik Wancik. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Dan Malaysia.” Wajah Hukum 4, no. 2 (2020): 261. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v4i2.246.
. Salam, Nur Zulfah Md Abdul, Norazla Abdul Wahab, and Hammad Mohamad Dahalan.“Penubuhan Majlis Peguam Syarie Wilayah - Wilayah Persekutuan: Satu Tinjauan Terhadap Tadbir Urus Peguam Syarie.” Journal of Muwafaqat 6, no. 1 (2023): 59–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53840/muwafaqat.v6i1.142.
. Sulastri, Lusia, Norcha Satria, and Adi Nugroho. “Reconstruction on The Regulations of Advocate Organi-Zational System As Accountability for The Quality of Professions.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 20, no. 1 (2020): 210–28. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2020.20.1.2936.
. Tolinggar, Vina Ayu Subagta, and Pieter Latumeten. “Urgensi Penggunaan Remote Notary Oleh Notaris Pasca Pandemi Covid-19.” Jurnal USM Law Review 5, no. 2 (2022): 663–77. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i2.5171.
. Wardhani, Lita Tyesta Addy Listya, Muhammad Dzikirullah H. Noho, and Aga Natalis. “The Adoption of Various Legal Systems in Indonesia: An Effort to Initiate the Prismatic Mixed Legal Systems.” Cogent Social Sciences 8, no. 1 (2022): 2104710. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2104710.
. Yuanitasari, Deviana. “The Role of Public Notary in Providing Legal Protection on Standard Contracts for Indonesian Consumers.” Sriwijaya Law Review 1, no. 2 (2017): 179–89. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol1.Iss2.43.pp179- 190.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
