Legal Implication Analysis of Decision Number 14/Pdt.G.S/2022/PN.Gto On The Legal Protection of Creditors Against Bad Debts Burdened By Fiduciary Guarantees

Authors

Seli Anggarani Kasih , Pujiyono , Noor Saptanti

DOI:

10.51601/ijersc.v7i3.1039

Published:

2026-06-30

Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to examine how legal protection for creditors is applied in judicial practice by analyzing the case in Decision Number 14/Pdt.G.S/2022/PN.Gto. It focuses on the legal protection available to creditors when a debtor defaults (bad debt) on a financing agreement secured by a fiduciary guarantee. This research is crucial as it highlights how the law provides a foundation for protection by recognizing agreements, establishing breach of contract (default), and granting rights over the collateral object.On the other hand, the evidentiary process in court and disputes surrounding the formal aspects of the guarantee show that such legal protection does not always run smoothly and can be influenced by various factors. Consequently, there is an urgent need to analyze the considerations weighed by the panel of judges in bad debt cases secured by fiduciary guarantees.This study utilizes a normative legal research method (doctrinal) by analyzing applicable legal regulations supported by other legal materials, including primary and secondary sources. The findings demonstrate that fiduciary guarantees are fundamentally recognized and enforced by courts through civil dispute resolution mechanisms. However, the implementation of this legal protection varies depending on the concrete circumstances of the case, particularly when disputes arise regarding the formal validity of the fiduciary guarantee that serves as the basis for protecting the creditor’s rights.

References

[1] Akbar Tantowi, “Hak Cipta Sebagai Jaminan Pemberian Kredit Bank Dikaitkan Dengan Prinsip 5C,” “Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI 2, no. 2 (2022): 581–92, https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol2/iss2/4.

[2] Alfariz Rahmatullah and Aditya Wirawan, “Reformulasi Atas Lelang Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 71/PUU-XIX/2021,” no. 3 (2022): 61–73.

[3] Andreas Andrie Djatmiko, Fury Setyaningrum, and Rifana Zainudin, “Implementasi Bentuk Ganti Rugi Menurut Burgelijk Wetboek (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata) Indonesia,” Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (2022): 1–10, https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v1i7.350.

[4] Dija Hedistira et al., “Kepemilikan Dan Penguasaan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Apabila Terjadi Sengketa Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kredit” VIII, no. 1 (2020): 78–83.

[5] Gumanti Retna, “Syarat Sahnya Perjanjian (Ditinjau Dari KUHPerdata) Retna Gumanti Abstrak,” Jurnal Pelangi Ilmu Vol.5 (2012).

[6] Kristiane Paendong and Herts Taunaumang, “Kajian Yuridis Wanprestasi Dalam Perikatan Dan Perjanjian Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata,” Yuridis, 2019, 1–7, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/41642.

[7] Mukti Fajar ND and Yulianto, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Penelitian Hukum Empiris, vol. 1 (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2010).

[8] Markuat Markuat, “Dampak Penetapan Lockdown Bagi Sebuah Negara Dalam Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Berdasarkan Asas Keadilan,” JPeHI (Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia) 3, no. 1 (2022): 80, https://doi.org/10.61689/jpehi.v3i1.336.

[9] Nyoni Novia Indriani, Andrianto Prabowo, and Dodik Wahyono, “Praktik Penggadaian Barang Jaminan Sepeda Motor Yang Masih Terikat Hak Fidusia” 6, no. 1 (2026), https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/jkih/article/download/796/416/1835 .

[10] Riana Zakaria, et al. Pertasnggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Di Kota Surabaya (Studi Putusan Nomor 1014/PID.B/2023/PN.SBY).2023. https://aksiologi.org/index.php/courtreview/article/download/1513/1020/9085

[11] Tjukup, I. Ketut, “Jurnal Ilmi Ah P Rodi Ma Gister Kenot Ariatan , 2 015 - 2016 Jurnal Ilmi Ah P Rodi Ma Gister Kenot Ariatan , 2015 - 2016,” Jurnal Ilmiah 1, no. 2502–8960 (2016): 188–95.

Author Biographies

Seli Anggarani Kasih, Master of Notarial Law, Faculty of Law, University of Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Pujiyono, Lecturers at the Faculty of Law, University of Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Noor Saptanti, Lecturers at the Faculty of Law, University of Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Anggarani Kasih, S., Pujiyono, & Noor Saptanti. (2026). Legal Implication Analysis of Decision Number 14/Pdt.G.S/2022/PN.Gto On The Legal Protection of Creditors Against Bad Debts Burdened By Fiduciary Guarantees. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences , 7(3), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v7i3.1039