Differences In The Results of The So-En Multi Tamara and Soekarno Kebayas On The Hourglass Body
DOI:
10.51601/ijersc.v7i5.1079Published:
2026-10-09Downloads
Abstract
This study compares modified kebaya outcomes produced using the So-En pattern method developed by Multi Tamara Boutique and the So-En pattern by Soekarno on one hourglass-body model. A quantitative comparative experimental design was used. Two kebayas were produced under controlled conditions of model, design, measurements, material, sewing technique, and finishing, then assessed by two fashion lecturers using 13 indicators across four aspects. Descriptive analysis showed total scores of 93 (89.42%) for Kebaya A and 99 (95.19%) for Kebaya B. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test yielded an Exact Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.500, exceeding 0.05. Thus, descriptive score differences were observed, particularly in placement accuracy and garment shape, but the difference was not statistically significant under the conditions of this study.
References
[1]. Andina, S., & Ismayuni, TU (2026). Utilization of Fabric Scraps in Making Entrepreneurial Products for Grade XI Students of SMK Gelora Jaya Nusantara. 9, 3320–3325.
[2]. Andrade, C. (2026). A primer on the intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability in medical research. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 196–200. https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry
[3]. Ariani, A., & Sugiyem, MP (2021). Differences In Kebaya Fitting Results Using Meyneke And Danckaerts System Patterns Author. Journal Of Fashion Engineering Education, Faculty Of Engineering, Yogyakarta State University, 1–15.
[4]. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
[5]. Darmansius, GH, & Puspaneli, P. (2025). Suitability of the Helen Joseph Armstrong Dress Pattern System for Tall and Large Indonesian Adult Women. Edutech, 24(2), 647–658. https://doi.org/10.17509/e.v24i2.82866
[6]. De Silva, R. K. J., Navodhya, P. U., & Gill, S. (2024). Analysis of body-to-pattern relationship using traditional pattern drafting techniques: implications for automated digital prototyping. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 17(1), 37–49.
[7]. Firmansyah, D., & Dede. (2022). General Sampling Techniques in Research Methodology: Literature Review. Journal of Holistic Education, 1(2), 85–114.
[8]. Habib, A., & Alam, S. (2024). A Comparative Study of 3D Virtual Pattern and Traditional Pattern Making. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtst.2024.101001
[9]. Hove, D. ten, Jorgensen, T.D., & Ark, L.A. van der. (2024). Updated Guidelines on Selecting an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for Interrater Reliability, With Applications to Incomplete Observational Designs. American Psychological Association, 29(5), 967–979.
[10]. Khairi, MF, Hidayat, MN, Sismita, N., Nurhayati, & Herlinda. (2025). Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments. Scientific Journal of Education, 15(September), 709–716. https://doi.org/10.33087/dikdaya.v15i2.891
[11]. Krisjayusman, Z., & Mariah, S. (2024). Comparison Of Fitting Factor Of Practical Construction Patterns With So-En Patterns On Women's Blazer Clothing. National Seminar On Culinary And Clothing Engineering Education, 19(1).
[12]. Kusumadewi, PDA, & Jerusalem, MA (2023). A review: The transformation of the meaning of kebaya from national clothing to a medium of self-representation and lifestyle. Mudra Journal of Arts and Culture, 38(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v38i2.2005
[13]. Moerbeek, M. (2023). Optimal placebo-treatment comparisons in trials with an incomplete within-subject design and heterogeneous costs and variances. PLOS ONE, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283382
[14]. Penko, T., & Rudolf, A. (2025). The effect of the difference in female body shapes on clothing fitting. AUTEX Research Journal, 25(1), 14.
[15]. Putri, TFL, & Indarti, I. (2026). Contemporary Kebaya with 'Berkain' Gen-Z Theme Through Front Bustier and Indonesian Textiles. Home Economics Journal, 10(1), 1–14.
[16]. Schickore, J., & Newman, W.R. (2024). Elusive Phenomena, Unwieldy Things.
[17]. Soekarno. (2025). Basic Clothing Pattern Making Guidebook (New Edition). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
[18]. Sugiyono. (2023). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods (H. Sutopo, Ed.; 5th Edition). Alfabeta.
[19]. Susmelly, S., Ernawati, E., Nelmira, W., Suci, Ph, & Hadiastuti, H. (2025). Development Of E-Module On Basic Pattern Making Materials Of So-En System For Clothing Pattern Construction Course For Fashion Design Students Of State University Of Padang. Edutech, 24(3).
[20]. Syeila, Ev, & Hidayati, L. (2024). Application Of Kebaya Resized Techniques At Maya Raisa Kebaya And Make Up Boutique Surabaya. Jpbd (Journal Of Fashion And Design Research), 4(2), 51–58.
[21]. Widiyanti, E., Wening, S., & Budiastuti, E. (2023). Modification Of Kebaya With Bustier Is Closely Linked To The Soen System. Home Economics Journal, 7(2), 56–62. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.21831/Hej.V7i2.56848
[22]. Yuliani, AEW, & Prasetyaningtyas, W. (2023). Feasibility of Modified Kebaya Products Made from Indonesian Traditional Textiles Using Zero Waste Pattern Techniques. Fashion and Fashion Education Journal, 12(1), 10–16.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
