Management of Khidmah Practices at Mualimin Muadalah Islamic Boarding Schools to Produce Quality Graduates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i2.357Keywords:
Khidmah practice, field service, mualimin Islamic boarding school, pesantren muadalah, prospective graduatesAbstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate and reveal the management process carried out in the
khidmah practice of Mualimin Muadalah Pesantren as a tradition as well as a unic programme to
produce quality graduates. This study was conducted at two Mualimin Muadalah Pesantren of
West Java Province, namely Pesantren Darussalam Garut and Pesantren Fajrussalam Bogor.
The method used is qualitative research with descriptive analysis techniques. The data is based
on observation, interviews, and documentation records. Research findings reveal that the
participants undergo one year of preparatory training in scientific writing, Islamic ancient
scripture literacy, worship leadership, teaching skills, and Arabic and English language skills.
The training was satisfies the institution although its stopped early due to the outbreak of the
Covid19 pandemic. After training, participants were sent to undergo a one-year field service
period consists of two domains: (1) carrying out teaching and administrative duties; (2) working
in the organizational structure of the pesantren and being involved in social and religious events
held by the pesantren. The management of teacher service practice does not show significant
problems, while the management of boarding service practice is still constrained by inconsistency
in supervision and assessment system that is not yet optimal.
Downloads
References
N. Hafidhoh, Pendidikan Islam di Pesantren Antara Tradisi dan Tuntutan
Perubahan, MUADDIB, 6:1, 2016, p. 90.
Direktorat pembinaan sekolah menengah kejuruan, Pedoman praktik kerja
lapangan, 2017, p. 4.
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406
O. Hamalik, Manjemen Pelatihan Ketenagakerjaan Pendekatan Terpadu, Jakarta:
PT Bumi Aksara, 2007, p. 21, 91
J.M. Barron, M.C. Berger, and A. Black, Introduction to On-the-Job Training,
Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1997, pp. 1-3.
S. Snell, and G.W. Bohlander, Managing Human Resources, Cengage Learning,
, pp. 305-306.
A. Bandura, Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective, Annual Review of
Psychology, 52, 2001, p. 1.
T.R. Wilson, et al., On-the-Job Training and Social Learning Theory: A Literature
Review, Special Report, Human Resources Reserch Org, Virginia, 1980, p. 8.
X. Liu and R. Batt, The Economic Pay-Offs To On-The-Job Training In Routine
Service Work, CAHRS Working Paper Series, Cornell University ILR School,
, p. 9.
Tarsono, Implikasi Teori Belajar Sosial (Social Learning Theory) Dari Albert
Bandura Dalam Bimbingan Dan Konseling, PSYMPATHIC Jurnal Ilmiah
Psikologi, 3, 2010, p. 29.
H.J. Lesilolo, Penerapan teori belajar sosial Albert Bandura dalam proses belajar
mengajar di sekolah, KENOSIS Journal, 4:2, 2018, p. 186.
L. Wicaknoso, Keefektivan Pemodelan Terhadap Peningkatan Efikasi-Diri Akademik
Siswa SMP – Kajian Teoritik Aplikasi Teori Bandura, Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan
J-VIP, 6, 2015, p. 1404.
M.N. Mubin, Pendekatan kognitif-sosial perspektif Albert Bandura pada
pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam, Edureligia, 5:1, 2021, p. 92.
N. Marhayati, Pendekatan Kognitif Sosial pada pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama
Islam, DAYAH Journal of Islamic Education, 3:2, 2020, p. 250.
E. Yanuardianto, Teori kognitif sosial Albert Bandura: Studi kritis dalam menjawab
problem pembelajaran di MI, Jurnal Auladuna, 1:2, 2019, p. 94.
Sugiyono, Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif, Alfabeta Bandung, 2019, p. 17.
L.J. Moleong, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Offset, 2017, p. 6.
V.A. Lambert, C.E. Lambert, Qualitative Descriptive Research: An Acceptable
Design, Pasific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16:4, 2012, p. 255-
M.B. Miles, A.M. Huberman, J. Saldana, Qualitative data analysis: A methods
sourcebook, London: Sage Publications, 2014, p. 14.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan
R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2014, p. 246.
Sukarna, Dasar-Dasar Manajemen, Bandung: CV Mandar Maju, 2011, p. 3, 82.
W.K. Hoy, and C.G. Miskel, Education Administration : Theory, Research, and
Practice, Singapore: Mc Graw-Hill Co. John M, 2008, p. 198.
A.A. Putra, Konsep Pendidikan Agama Islam Perspektif Imam Al-Ghazali, Jurnal
Ath-Thariqah, 1:1, 2016, p. 49.
D.A. Black, et al., On job Training, Establishment Size and Firm size: Evidence for
Economies of Scale in the Production of Human Capital, Southern Economic
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406
Journal, 66:1, 1999, p. 82-100.
J. Jacobs, M. Lukens, dan M. Useem, Organizational, Job and Individual
Determinants of Workplace Training: Evidence from National Organizational
Survey, Social Science Quarterly, 77:1, 1996, p. 158-177.
D.H. Schunk, dan M.K. Dibenedetto, Motivation and social cognitive theory.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 2019
A.H. Ghazali, Mukhtashar Ihya Ulumuddin. Terjemah: Zaid Husein, Jakarta:
Pustaka Amani, 2016, p. 305.
F. Copland, Causes of tension in post-observation feedback in pre-service teacher
training: An alternative view. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26:3, 2010, p. 466.
C. Brandt, Integrating feedback and reflection in teacher preparation. ELT Journal,
:1, 2008, p. 37-46.
S.E. Widodo, Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan untuk guru dan kepala sekolah,
Jakarta: Ardadizya Jaya, 2011, p. 13.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
