Comparative Study Of Learning Achievement Using The Structured Handouts

Authors

  • Agung Listiadi Lecturer at Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya Faculty Economic and business, Unesa Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i4.408

Abstract

The learning achievement of each student will not be the same, because each student has certain abilities
that vary from other students in terms of ability and ability to master the material, even though the
object/criteria for the assessment are the same. For this reason, study Structured handouts that are in
accordance with the characteristics of students are very supportive in improving study achievement.
Structured handouts are basically self-instruction. Therefore, study through structured handouts emphasizes
the active role of students in study themselves. This study uses a quantitative Independent T test method by
comparing the mean of the control class and the experimental class. The results of the Independent t test
showed that the calculated value resulted in an alpha significance value of less than α = 5%. Thus, it can be
concluded that there is a significant difference in learning achievement before and after using the combined
excel structured handout. The use of structured handouts in learning is more feasible in realizing creativity
and innovation in students because it focuses on the individual abilities of students. Learning by using
structured handouts allows students to measure their own abilities and can improve their own abilities
without feeling pressured.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Learning, 51, 241-247.

. Bakar Rahim, N. I., & Hamza, R. (2014). Teaching as A Career Choice: A Discriminant Analysis of Factors as Perceived by Technical and vocational Learning (TVE) Student Teachers in Malaysia. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 19, 69–75. Https://Doi.Org/10.5829/Idosi.Mejsr.2014.19.Icmrp.11.

. Daryanto. 2013. Compiling structured handouts: Study materials For Teacher Preparation in Learning. Yogyakarta: Publisher Gava Media.

. Depdiknas. 2008. Teaching Material Development Guide. Jakarta : Dirjen Mandikdasmen, Depdiknas Indonesia.

. Eren Altay. 2012. Prospective Teachers' Interest in Teaching, Professional Plans about Teaching and Career Choice Satisfaction: A Relevant Framework?. Australian Journal of Learning, 56(3), 303-318.

. Hamalik Oemar. 2006. Teaching and learning process. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

. Hamalik Oemar. 2007. Curriculum and Learning. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara

. Handler Beth. 2010. Teacher as Curriculum Leader: A Consideration of the Appropriateness of that Role Assignment to Classroom-Based Practitioners. International Journal of Teacher Leadership Volume 3, Number 3, Winter 2010.

. Khalid Abida et all. 2012. Constructivist Vs Traditional: Effective Instructional Approach in Teacher Learning. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 5; March 2012.

. Lampert, M., & Graziani, F. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers’ and teacher educators’ learning. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 491-509.

. Mulyasa E. 2005. 2004 Curriculum Implementation. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

. Misra Srikant. 2012. Implications of Globalization on Learning. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional Learning ISSN: 2066 – 7329 (print), ISSN: 2067 – 9270

. Norlidah Alias. 2012. Design and Development of Physics Structured handouts based on Learning Style and Appropriate Technology by Employing Isman Instructional Design Model. The Turkish Online Journal of Learning Technology – October 2012, volume 11 Issue 4

. Psacharopoulos George. 2004. Returns to Investment in Learning: A Further. Journal Learning Economics, Vol. 12, No. 2, August 2004

. Prastowo, A. 2011. Creative Guide to Making Innovative Teaching Materials. Jogjakarta: DIVA Press.

. Robertson Ian 2008. VET Teachers’ Knowledge and Expertise. International Journal of Training Research. Volume 6, Number 1, 2008 pp 1-22 .

. Sudjana Nana. 2005. The basics of the teaching and learning process. Jakarta : Sinar baru Algesindostatistika applied to socio-economic studies.

. Sudjana Nana. 2014. Research Results of the Teaching and Learning Process. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

. Syah Muhibbin. 2007. Learning Psychology. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.

. Slameto. 2009. Learning and the Factors That Affect It. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

. User Usman. 2006. Become a Professional Educator. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Downloads

Published

2022-09-01

How to Cite

Listiadi, A. (2022). Comparative Study Of Learning Achievement Using The Structured Handouts. International Journal of Educational Research &Amp; Social Sciences, 3(4), 1348–1358. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i4.408

Issue

Section

Articles