Legal Problems The Implementation Of Credit Agreements With Fiduciary Guarantees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i1.582Abstract
This look at targets to analyze the legal problems with the implementation of Credit Agreements, especially in relation to the credit using fiduciary guarantees as collateral. Financing institutions use Credit Agreements that are included in the Standard Agreement. Because credit is a business activity of financial institutions, in this case it is a bank, in order to achieve a national balance in distributing funds to the public. In carrying out its function, banks as financial institutions provide credit, therefore the provisions of the Guarantee Law are intended to help business activities both macro and micro, as well as create legal certainty for stakeholders. To achieve the goal of obtaining legal certainty regarding Credit Agreements with Fiduciary Guarantees, This study uses an empirical legal approach method, and the research specifications are descriptive analytical.This study produced a data, namely it was concluded that Fiduciary Guarantee is a form of guarantor by the debtor at his request, in order to guarantee the repayment of credit debts, movable objects become the object of guarantee in this study. The Supplementary Agreement or what is often referred to as the Accesoir of the Principal Credit Agreement can be guaranteed by the Fiduciary Guarantee, while the charge is made in the form of a notarized, by guaranteeing legal certainty so that it needs to be Register with the Trustee Registration Authority and apply for issuance of a Trustee Certificate to gain enforcement powers. The obstacle arises when defaulting by the debtor, with various causes and factors. Sometimes execution efforts are made to save credit that has been channeled by financing institutions, especially banks, but in practice there are many obstacles, including in executing the object of the guarantee that is not found, has changed hands or is controlled by others, so that execution in the form of auctioning fiduciary objects is difficult to do.
Downloads
References
E. Mulyati, “Asas Keseimbangan Pada Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan Dengan Nasabah Pelaku Usaha Kecil,” J.
Bina Mulia Huk., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 2016.
M. Yasir, “Aspek Hukum Jaminan Fidusia,” SALAM J. Sos. dan Budaya Syar-i, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 75–92, 2016.
K. K. Rufaida, “Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Titel Eksekutorial Yang
Sah,” Refleks. Huk. J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 21–40, 2019.
T. Prasetya and M. Jafar, “the Repercussions of Violating the Provisions of,” Ius, vol. 7, no. 3, 2019.
B. K. Heriawanto, “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Title Eksekutorial,” Leg. J. Ilm.
Huk., vol. 27, no. 1, p. 54, 2019.
R. Hidayat and S. Soegianto, “Resolution of Debtor Defaults on Registered,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 289–299, 2019.
M. Idris, “Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan Konvensional Dan Akad Pembiayaan Perbankan Syariah Suatu Tinjauan
Deskriptif Dalam Hukum Di Indonesia,” Ekp, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1576–1580, 2015.
J. Winarno, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Pada Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia,” J. Indep., vol. 1, no. 1, p.
, 2013.
P. Studi, I. Hukum, and U. P. Ganesha, “Tentang Jaminan Fidusia Bagi Debitur Terkait Ambil Alih (Take Over)
Kredit Dengan Akta Bawah Tangan Oleh,” vol. 5, pp. 500–514, 2022.
S. Ahyani, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Melalui Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia,” J. Wawasan Huk., vol.
, no. 01, pp. 308–319, 2011.
A. T. Sayuti, Y. Erwita, and L. N. Hidayah, “Parate Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia : Urgensi dan Rekonstruksi
Hukum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019,” Soumatera Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 2,
pp. 185–196, 2020.
N. P. T. P. Nusantara, “Eksekusi Dan Pendaftaran Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor
Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia,” J. Fak. Huk. Univ. Udayana, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 8–9, 2018.
D. Hedistira and ’ Pujiyono, “Kepemilikan Dan Penguasaan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Apabila Terjadi Sengketa
Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kredit,” J. Priv. Law, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 78, 2020.
S. N. Nugraha and N. Rahmawati, “Cidera Janji (Wanprestasi) dalam Perjanjian Fidusia berdasarkan Pasal 15
Ayat(3)UU Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor:18/PUU-XVII/2019 dan
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor:2/PUU-XIX/2021,”Al WASATH J Ilmu Huk.,vol.2,no.2,pp.77–91, 2021.
R. Usman, “Makna Pengalihan Hak Kepemilikan Benda Objek Jaminan Fidusia Atas Dasar Kepercayaan,” J.
Huk. Ius Quia Iustum, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 139–162, 2021.
S. Mulyani, “Realitas Pengakuan Hukum Terhadap Hak atas Hak Atas Merek Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia Pada
Praktik Perbankan,” J. Huk. dan Din. Masy., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 139, 2014.
S. M. Badriyah, “No Title,” Media Huk., vol. 22, no. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Dalam Penggunaan
Base Transceifer Station (BTS) Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Kredit, p. 2, 2015.
N. Apriansyah, “Keabsahan Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Yang Didaftarkan Secara Elektronik ( Validity of
Electronically Registered Certificate of Fiduciary Transfer ),” Jikh, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 227–242, 2018.
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406
H. D. Hayatdian, “Kajian Hukum Surat Kuasa Dibawah Tangan Sebagai Dasar Pembuatan Akta Jaminan
Fidusia,” J. Huk. Unsrat, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 120–135, 2013.
S. Mulyani, “Konstruksi Konsep Hak Atas Merek Dalam Sistem Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Sebagai Upaya
Mendukung Pembangunan Ekonomi,” Masal. Huk., vol. 1945, no. 003, pp. 213–223, 2014.
R. F. Kusumaningtyas, “Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Berkaitan dengan Hak Cipta sebagai Objek
Jaminan Fidusia,” Pandecta Res. Law J., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 96–112, 2016.
R.- Saraswati, “Problematika Hukum Undang-Undang No.12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan
Perundang-Undangan,” Yust. J. Huk., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 97–103, 2013.
FATMA PAPARANG, “7220-14152-1-Sm,” Vol. 1 Nomor 2 Tahun 2014, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 56–70, 2014.
L. K. P. Rosari, I. N. Koeswahyono, and D. A. Wisnuwardhani, “Implikasi yuridis parate eksekusi obyek hak
tanggungan,” J. Cakrawala Huk., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 68–77, 2022.
R. Y. M. M. Heriyanto; Gulo, Farius; Ubaidillah, “Prinsip Kepastian Hukum Dalam Judicial Review UndangUndang Fidusia Terkait Kesamaan Kedudukan Sertifikat Fidusia Dan Putusan Pengadilan,” Surya Kencana, vol.
, pp. 248–264, 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
