Notary's Responsibility For Authentic Deeds Which The Participant Uses A Fake Identity In Sukoharjo Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v5i6.900Abstract
Authentic deeds have a very important position. This is because authentic deeds are recognized by law and have very strong evidentiary power. Often cases of identity forgery by the witness used in the making of authentic deeds are found, which have a serious impact and cause various problems. The notary is only in charge of recording the data and information provided by the witness, as is known, the notary does not have the authority to conduct a material and passive investigation of false information and identities by the witnesses, but often if the notary is dragged and held accountable in the event of a dispute. The purpose of this writing, in general, the author wants to develop legal knowledge in the field of notary law. The writing in this journal analyzes the responsibility of notaries for authentic deeds that use false identities and the efforts that can be made by notaries to prevent identity forgery in making authentic deeds. So that unwanted things do not happen to people in good faith and notaries. The method of approach used is a qualitative approach, a research method that focuses on a deep understanding of the phenomenon being studied through the interpretation of context and meaning. This approach tends to generate descriptive data in the form of words, imagery, or narratives, and focuses more on understanding how and why a phenomenon occurs rather than simply measuring its frequency or magnitude. The results of the study show that the responsibility of a notary in making authentic deeds can be seen from the negligence of the Notary in making authentic deeds, the negligence in question is if the notary has made a deed that is not in accordance with the existing rules or the notary consciously and deliberately makes a deed with the aim of benefiting himself or certain parties, then the notary can be held responsible, However, if the negligence that arises is not from the notary but from the witness, either intentionally or unrelated to the identity or false information provided by the witness which is used as the basis for making an authentic deed and makes the deed incorrect, then it becomes the responsibility of the parties themselves as it is known that the notary has no obligation and is passive in terms of materially investigating the information and or the identity submitted by the witness.
Downloads
References
Ahdiana Yuni Lestari And Endang Heriyani. (2008). Basics Of Making Contracts And Contracts . Muhammadiyah University Of Yogyakarta.
Andi Hamzah. (2005). Legal Dictionary . Ghalia Indonesia
Arikunto, S. (2002). Research Methods . PT. Dunia Java.
Barda Nawawi Arief. (2010). Anthology Of Criminal Law Policy . PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Erliyani, Rahmida, Hamdan, SR (2023). Notary Deeds In Proving Civil Cases And The Development Of Cyber Notary. Dialectics.
Lexy J. Moleong. (2011). Qualitative Research Methodology . Rosdakarya Offset Youth.
Muladi. (2002). Democratization, Human Rights, And Legal Reform In Indonesia . The Habibie Centre.
Munir Fuady. (2003). Contract Law (From A Business Law Perspective) . PT. Citra Aditya Bakti,.
Riduan Syahrani. (2013). The Ins And Outs And Principles Of Civil Law . Gramedia Pustaka.
Ridwan HR (2022). State Administrative Law . UII Press.
Satjipto Rahardjo. (1992). Legal Science . Alumni.
Satochid Kartanegara. (2001). Criminal Law: Collection Of Lectures Part One . Student Lecture Hall.
Shalihah, F. (2015). Textbook Of Sociology Of Law . Faculty Of Law, Islamic University Of Riau.
Sjaifuracchman. (2011). Aspects Of Notary Accountability In Making Deeds . Mandar Maju.
Soekidjo Notoatmojo. (2010). Health Ethics And Law . Rineka Cipta.
Soerjono Soekanto. (1992). Introduction To Legal Research . Ui Press.
Soerjono Soekanto. (1993). Factors Influencing Law Enforcementno Title . PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Soerodjo, I. (2003). Legal Certainty Of Land Rights In Indonesia . Arkola.
Subekti. (2001). Principles Of Civil Law . Intermasa.
Subekti. (2005). Law Of Evidence . PT. Pradnya Paramitha
Sudarsono. (2012). Legal Dictionary . Rineka Cipta.
Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2006). Indonesian Civil Procedure Law . Liberty.
Suparman Usman.(2008).Ethics And Responsibilities Of The Legal Profession In Indonesia. Gaya Media Pratama.
Titik Triwulan And Shinta. (2010). Legal Protection For Patients . Pustaka Achievements.
Valerine JL Kriekhoff. (2007). Professional Responsibility . Faculty Of Law, University Of Indonesia.
William J. Camblis And Robert B. Seidman. (1971). Law, Order, And Power, Reading . Mess Addison.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro. (2000). Unlawful Acts . Mandar Maju.
Absori. (2005). Environmental Law Enforcement In The Reform Era. Journal Of Legal Studies , 8 (2), 228.
Akhmad, SN (2019). The Power Of Authentic Deeds Made By Notaries To Prove Against Forgery Criminal Actions. Journal Of Law And Notary , 3 (1), 84. Https://Doi.Org/10.33474/Hukeno.V3i1.1921
Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto Et Al. (2023). Debtor's Default In Oral Agreements (Case Study Of Butik Warna, North Lampung Regency). Proceedings Of The Conference On Law And Social Studies , 4 (1).
Armansyah. (2018). Legal Ownership And Reporting Obligations For Suspicious Financial Transactions. Journal Of Law , 1 (2), 1–18.
Herlin, A. Dean And E. (2022). Legal Protection Of Personal Data Misused For Prostitution Activities. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesian Of Law And Social Political Governance , 2 (1), 222.
Irene Ulfa. (2018). Proof Of Advocacy In The Crime Of Child Murder. Iuris Media Journal, 1 (2), 303–304.
Kerina Maulidya Putri, Ichsan Anwary, DH (2022). Obligation Of Notaries To Read And Sign Deeds In Front Of All Parties Together. Notary Law Journal , 1 (2), 158.
Linda Nugrahani, Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto, MM (2023). Notary's Responsibility For Disputes Between Parties Regarding Debt Agreement Deeds Based On False Information. Proceeding Legal Symposium , 1 .
Muhammad Bagas Sutristyo. (2022). Application Of Notary Negligence Sanctions In Forgery Of Signatures On Minutes Of Deeds Against Notary Violations (Study Of Decision No. 142/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Skh). Journal Of Social Sciences And Education (JISIP) , 6 (4), 2562.
Puspa Pasaribu, EAZ (2021). Legal Consequences Of False Identity In Credit Agreement Deeds Involving Third Party Guaranteers. USM Law Review Journal , 4 (2), 535–540.
Stefanie Waringga Y, ASS (2020). Responsibilities Of Notaries Who Have Ppat Authority In Making Power Of Attorney To Impose Mortgage Rights. Jurnal Privat Law , VIII (2), 312–313.
Zahira, S. (2021). Legal Consequences Of The Existence Of Fictitious Parties In Sale And Purchase Deeds (Study Of The Decision Of The North Jakarta District Court Number 845/Pid.Sus/2018/Pn.Jkt.Utr. Indonesian Notary , 3 (1), 1–30.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.