The Authority Of The Indonesia Constitutional Court In Revi Ew Of Law Against Basic Law
The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia is a State Institution as a product of the Third Amendment
to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The Third Amendment stipulates that the Constitutional
Court of the Republic of Indonesia must have been established on August 17, 2003.Article 24C paragraph (1)
Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia year 1945 stipulates that The Constitutional Court has four powers and
one obligation. First review: a .to review the law against the constitution, b. resolve disputes between state
institutions whose authority is granted by the Constitution, c. dissolve a political party d. resolve disputes over
election results. Meanwhile, one obligation of the Constitutional Court is to decide on the opinion of the DPR that
the President is based on the opinion of the DPR regarding alleged violations of the law by the president and vice
president according to the Constitution. But this research just discussed the first authority, namely to review the
law to Basic Law. This research is a normative legal research using various legal norms as an analysis material.
Conclusions are drawn using legal interpretation.
Abdul Latif, Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Demokrasi,Total Media,
Abdoel Mukthie Fadjar, Tipe Negara Hukum, Bayu Media Publishing, Malang, 2004.
Reformasi Konstitusi dalam Masa Transisi Paradigmatik, In-Trans, Malang, 2003.
Hukum Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi,
Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Perkembangan Hukum di Indonesia, Orasi Ilmiah dalam Rangka Dies Natalis
Universitas Brawijaya ke-47, Malang, 20 Pebruari,2010.
Partai Politik dalam Perkembangan Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Malang, In-TRANS, 2008.
Abdul Rasyid Thalib, Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya dalam Sistem Keetataanrgaraan
Republik Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2006.
U. Stadler-Altmann, “Learning environment: The influence of school and classroom space on education,”
Routledge Int. Handb. Soc. Psychol. Classr., no. January 2015, pp. 252–262, 2015, doi:
R. Malik and A. Rizvi, “Effect of classroom learning environment on students’ academic achievement in
mathematics at secondary level,” Bull. Educ. Res., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 207–218, 2018, [Online]. Available:
J. Volpe White and K. Guthrie, “Creating a Meaningful Learning Environment: Reflection in Leadership
Education,” J. Leadersh. Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 60–75, 2016, doi: 10.12806/v15/i1/r5.
L. Closs, M. Mahat, and W. Imms, “Learning environments’ influence on students’ learning experience in an
Australian Faculty of Business and Economics,” Learn. Environ. Res., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 271–285, 2022, doi:
J. Dron, “Smart learning environments, and not so smart learning environments: a systems view,” Smart Learn.
Environ., vol. 5, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40561-018-0075-9.
P. A. García-Tudela, P. Prendes-Espinosa, and I. M. Solano-Fernández, “Smart learning environments: a basic
research towards the definition of a practical model,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, doi:
D. R. Garrison and N. D. Vaughan, Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and
Guidelines, First Edit. United States of America: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint, 2008.
N. Moore and M. Gilmartin, “Teaching for Better Learning : A Blended Learning Pilot Project with First-Year
Geography Undergraduates,” vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 327–344, 2010, doi: 10.1080/03098265.2010.501552.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.