Authorities Of The Constitutional Court In Dissoluting Political Parties

Authors

  • Winasis Yulianto Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Abdurachman Saleh Situbondo, Indonesia
  • Dyah Silvana Amalia Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Abdurachman Saleh Situbondo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i3.666

Abstract

Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, hereinafter
referred to as the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that, the Constitutional
Court has the authority to try at the first and final levels whose decision is final to review laws
against the Constitution, decide on disputes over the authority of state institutions whose powers are
granted by the Constitution, decide on the dissolution of political parties, and decide on disputes
about the results of general elections. The dissolution of political parties through this legal aspect is
the result of the third amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Previously,
the dissolution of political parties was carried out by the government. The dissolution of political
parties through legal channels is a consequence of the statement that Indonesia is a state of law.
This is also due to the provisions of Article 1 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic
of Indonesia which states that Sovereignty is in the hands of the people and implemented according
to the Constitution. The provisions of Article 1 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the
Republic of Indonesia constitute a shift from the supremacy of the People's Consultative Assembly
to the supremacy of the Constitution The research method used in this study is a normative juridical
research method, which means that this research uses legal norms as a means to analyze problems.
While the approach method in this study uses: statute approach, conceptual approach, historical
approach, and comparison approach. To analyze in this research is to use the interpretation of
legal systematics.The conclusion will answer the problems raised in this study.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. M. Faiz, Amandemen Konstitusi, Rajawali Pers, 2019.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indnesia Tahun 1945..

W. E. e. all., Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta: 2010, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.

T. L. Kompas, Partai-Partai Politik Indonesia: Ideologi dan Program 2004 -2009, Jakarta: Kompas, 2004.

Soelastomo, Membangun Sistem Politik Bangsa dalam Masyarakat Warga dan Pergulatan Demokrasi, Jakarta: Kompas, 2001.

M. Budiardjo, artisipasi dan Partai Politik: Sebuah Bunga Rampai, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 1982.

H. Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State, New York: Russel and Russel, 1961.

V. V. M. &. M. Madalina, "Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pembubaran Partai Politik," Souveignity: Jurnal Demokrrasi dan Ketahanan Nasional, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 323, 2022.

B. A. G. et.all, Black’s Law Dictionary, St. Paul Minn: Seventh Editions, 1999.

J. Harold, A Grammar of Politic, London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1951.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1999 tentang Partai Politik.

J. Asshiddiqie, Kemerdekaan Berserikat, Pembubaran Partai Politik dan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MKRI, 2005.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1999 tentang Partai Politik.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 tentang Partai Politik.

Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 1999 tentang Perubahan Kitab-Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana yang Berkaitan Dengan Kejahatan terhadap Keamanan Negara.

M. M. A. &. P. M. Faiz, Argentum in Constitutum, Depok: Rajawali Press, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Yulianto, W. ., & Silvana Amalia, D. . (2023). Authorities Of The Constitutional Court In Dissoluting Political Parties. International Journal of Educational Research &Amp; Social Sciences, 4(3), 590–597. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i3.666

Issue

Section

Articles