Legal Force Of The Binding Agreement For Sale And Purchase In Full And The Power To Sell With A Non-Electronic Id Card Identity

Authors

  • Prasetyo Raharjo Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia
  • Pujiyono Pujiyono Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia
  • Arief Suryono Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i4.681

Abstract

A Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB) is an obligatoir agreement that usually includes a power to sell
clause. Under certain conditions, illegal acts may arise such as the seller disappearing after signing the deed as
in the case of a civil case registered in the Karanganyar District court number 2 / Pdt.G / 2021 / PN Krg. The
obligation to include an Electronic KTP in the transfer of rights raises problems with the paid PPJB and selling
power made during the transition of self-identity from Non-Electronic KTP to Electronic KTP, namely in 2011 at
which time the process of transferring rights at the National Land Agency (BPN) office was still received using a
non-electronic KTP. This research method is juridical normative to determine the legal strength of paid off
PPJB and the power to sell with a non-electronic ID card identity. The legal force of PPJB in full and the power
to sell with a non-electronic ID card identity is valid and has binding legal consequences and must be
implemented by the parties as ordered by law, if the PPJB is carried out and meets the requirements for the
validity of the agreement as stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, the fulfillment of the principles of the
agreement and the elements of the agreement therein and does not violate the provisions, decency and decency
and the laws in force at the time the deed was made. Apart from that, the legal force of proof attached to an
authentic deed is perfect in the sense that the proof is sufficient with the deed itself unless there is evidence of an
opponent who proves otherwise and the judge is bound by the deed itself as long as the deed made is in
accordance with the provisions of the validity of a deed as stipulated in the UUJN and Civil Code.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Subekti. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa, cet. 21, 2005. hal. 1.

Salim HS. Hukum Perjanjian Nominaat dan In Nominaat. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2008. hlm.9.

Riza Firdaus. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Yang Masih

Berstatus Hak Pengelolaan”, Jurnal LamLaj Vol. 2 Issue. 1 2017

Made Ara Denara dan I Made Dedy Priyanto, “Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) Dalam Transaksi

Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah dan/atau Bangunan”, dalam Jurnal Kertha Semaya Vol. 8 No. 1 2019

Gaol, S.L.,. Keabsahan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Sebagai Dasar Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli

Tanah Dalam Rangka Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Penyalah gunaan Keadaan (Misbruik Van

Omstandigheden). Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 11(1), 2021.

Herlina Hasibuan, “Analisis Yuridis Penolakan Pembatalan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) Hak

Atas Tanah Melalui Prosedur Gugatan Ke Pengadilan (Studi Putusan MA No. 3703.K/PDT/2016)”, Jurnal

Perspektif Hukum Vol 2 No. 1, 2021.

Abdul Kadir Muhammad. Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1992. hal. 78.

Gede Tusan Ardika dan Ramli.“Kekutan Hukum Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah (Studi Di Desa

Babakan Kecamatan Sandubaya Kota Mataram)”, Jurnal Unmasmataram Vol. 13 No. 1 2019.

Gita Rianty Hapsari, “Jual Beli Tanah Berdasarkan Akta Pengakuan Utang dan Akta Kuasa Jual sebagai Jaminan

Pelunasan Utang yang Timbul Berdasarkan Tindak Pidana Penggelapan (Analisis Putusan Nomor

/PDT/2013/PT.MKS),” (Tesis Magister Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 2016, hlm. 61.

International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

https://ijersc.org/

https://disdukcapil.bogorkab.go.id/post/program-penerapan-kartu-tandapenduduk elektronik (diakses 15 juni

Anggraeny, I. and Al-Fatih, S., Kata Sepakat Dalam Perjanjian Dan Relevansinya Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan

Wanprestasi. De Lega Lata, 5(1), 2022, pp.57-66.

Wahyuni, S., Madiong, B. and Makkawaru, Z., Analisis Wewenang Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian

Pengikatan Jual Beli Hak Milik Atas Tanah Di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Paradigma Administrasi Negara, 3(2),

, pp.131-137 .

Ramadhani, R., Kedudukan Hukum Perjanjian Perikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) dalam Kegiatan Pendaftaran Peralihan

Hak Atas Tanah. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 3(1), 2022, pp.45-50.

Remaja, N.G., Makna Hukum Dan Kepastian Hukum. Kertha Widya, 2(1), 2014.

R. Subekti, Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perikatan Nasional, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti,1998, hlm.29.

Made Ara Denara dan I Made Dedy Priyanto, “Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) Dalam Transaksi

Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah dan/atau Bangunan”, dalam Jurnal Kertha Semaya Vol. 8 No. 1 2019

Herlien Budiono, artikel “Pengikat Jual Beli Dan Kuasa Mutlak”Majalah Renvoi, edisi Tahun I, No. 10, Bulan

Maret 2004, hlm. 57

R. Subekti. Hukum Perjanjian, Bandung : Bina Cipta, 1987, hlm.75

Agus Yudha Hernoko. Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial (Cet. 4).

Prenamedia Group, 2014, Jakarta.

Perika, D., Fungsi Notaris Dalam Pemeriksaan Identitas Penghadap Terhadap Autentisitas Akta Dihubungkan

Dengan Asas Kehati-Hatian. Syiar Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2020,hlm. 18.

Syamsul Sidharta, Tugas dan Kewenangan Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik, Prenada Media, Jakarta,

, hlm.15

Downloads

Published

2023-08-30

How to Cite

Raharjo, P. ., Pujiyono, P., & Suryono, A. (2023). Legal Force Of The Binding Agreement For Sale And Purchase In Full And The Power To Sell With A Non-Electronic Id Card Identity. International Journal of Educational Research &Amp; Social Sciences, 4(4), 670–677. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i4.681

Issue

Section

Articles