Curriculum Management in Improving Education Quality (Multisite Study on the S-1 PGMI Study Program at UIN Satu Tulungagung and the S-1 PGMI Study Program at UIN Maliki Malang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v6i2.955Abstract
This study examines the strategies for curriculum planning, implementation, and evaluation in the S-1 PGMI study program at UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung and UIN Maliki Malang to improve education quality. This qualitative research uses interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis. Data analysis is conducted through single-site and cross-site analysis, and data validity is tested through credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. The findings show that the curriculum planning strategy integrates the administrative model and grassroots model through the formation of a curriculum development team, SWOT analysis, and curriculum preparation, which includes graduate profiles, Graduate Learning Outcomes (CPL), and course offerings. The implementation strategy uses the Enactment Curriculum approach and the Innovation Profile model (diagnosis, application, evaluation, follow-up). The evaluation strategy is conducted using the Outcome-Based Education (OBE) approach, which includes context, input, process, and product evaluation. Overall, these strategies are designed for adaptation to the challenges of the global era and to produce competitive graduates.
Downloads
References
N. Thalib and U. Haris, “Implementasi Kebijakan Pendidikan Di Kabupaten Merauke (Analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional),” J. Adm. Karya Dharma, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 76–84, Mar. 2023, Accessed: Apr. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.jurnal.stiakdmerauke.ac.id/index.php/jakd/article/view/46
N. S. Alotaibi and A. H. Alshehri, “Prospers and Obstacles in Using Artificial Intelligence in Saudi Arabia Higher Education Institutions—The Potential of AI-Based Learning Outcomes,” Sustain. 2023, Vol. 15, Page 10723, vol. 15, no. 13, p. 10723, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3390/SU151310723.
“Internal Quality Assurance System in the Metro State Institute of Islamic Religion in Lampung, Indonesia. | EBSCOhost.” Accessed: Apr. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A5%3A10953941/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A159790339&crl=c&link_origin=scholar.google.co.id
Y. Zhao, M. Zhao, and F. Shi, “Integrating Moral Education and Educational Information Technology: A Strategic Approach to Enhance Rural Teacher Training in Universities,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 15053–15093, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1007/S13132-023-01693-Z/METRICS.
D. Andriani, “A critical review of the labor competitiveness as human capital in Indonesia,” Int. J. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. (2147- 4478), vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 52–65, 2021, doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i5.1303.
N. R. Sonia, “Education Transdisipliners: Integration Interconnection Approach in Independent Curriculum Policy Learning-Independent Campus,” Proceeding Int. Conf. Relig. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, pp. 169–180, Feb. 2022, Accessed: Apr. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://sunankalijaga.org/prosiding/index.php/icrse/article/view/789
N. Rofiq, “Curriculum Development Model As Solution For Adaptive Education In The Era Of Disruption,” GAJIE Glob. J. Islam. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 63–74, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.58518/GAJIE.V1I1.3269.
N. Efendi, “Implementation of Total Quality Management and Curriculum on the Education Quality,” J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 120–149, 2022.
M. El Widdah, “Madrasah Management Strategy as the Education Base for Religious Cadre,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 227–242, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.26803/IJLTER.21.11.13.
E. E. Y. Prayogi, S. Anwar, Y. A. D, and Yetri, “Management of Madrasa-Based Education Quality Improvement at the Tahfidz Qur’an Islamic Boarding School in Metro City,” Rev. Int. Geogr. Educ. Online, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 480–491, 2021, doi: 10.48047/rigeo.11.07.52.
D. Blakemore, “Relevance theory,” pp. 1147–1158, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1075/HOP.M2.REL1.
Y. E. Rachmad, “Leadership Flexibility Theory,” 2022.
C. Sedikides, E. K. Hong, and T. Wildschut, “Self-Continuity,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., vol. 74, no. Volume 74, 2023, pp. 333–361, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1146/ANNUREV-PSYCH-032420-032236/CITE/REFWORKS.
W. W. Gasparski, “On the Concept of Practicality,” Praxiol. Pragmatism Int. Annu. Pract. Philos. Methodol. Vol. 10, vol. 10, pp. 61–70, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.4324/9781351324045-2/CONCEPT-PRACTICALITY-WOJCIECH-GASPARSKI.
J. L. Price, “The Study of Organizational Effectiveness,” Sociol. Q., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 1972, doi: 10.1111/J.1533-8525.1972.TB02100.X;WEBSITE:WEBSITE:TFOPB;PAGEGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION.
J. Ameyaw, E. Turnhout, B. Arts, and A. Wals, “Creating a responsive curriculum for postgraduates: lessons from a case in Ghana,” J. Furth. High. Educ., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 573–588, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2017.1386285.
S. Elo and H. Kyngäs, “The qualitative content analysis process,” J. Adv. Nurs., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 107–115, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
D. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan. 2013.
Sugiono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2014.
jhon w Ceswell, “Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches/John W Creswell. -3rd ed.,” Muqarnas, vol. 8, pp. 94–102, 1991.
P. H. Junior and G. Abib, “The Qualitative Report Validity in Qualitative Research: A Processual Approach”, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3443.
“Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi | JDIH Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.” Accessed: Apr. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/detail_peraturan?main=2146
“Penerapan Kurikulum Berbasis KKNI di Perguruan Tinggi | GEOTIMES.” Accessed: Apr. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://geotimes.id/opini/penerapan-kurikulum-berbasis-kkni-di-perguruan-tinggi/
M. Y. Lee, J. S. Lee, and J. R. Goodwin, “What’s the Difference? A Comparison of Student-Centered Teaching Methods,” Educ. Sci. 2024, Vol. 14, Page 736, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 736, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.3390/EDUCSCI14070736.
M. A. Conde, F. García, M. J. Rodríguez-Conde, M. Alier, and A. García-Holgado, “Perceived openness of Learning Management Systems by students and teachers in education and technology courses,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 517–526, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.CHB.2013.05.023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
