Digital Governance and Green Business: Efforts to Realize Sustainable MSMEs in Pekanbaru City from an SDG Perspective
DOI:
10.51601/ijersc.v7i3.1043Published:
2026-06-30Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of digital governance and green business practices as a means to foster sustainable Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Pekanbaru City, viewed through the lens of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Digital transformation in governance and the adoption of eco-friendly business practices are crucial factors in enhancing MSME competitiveness while supporting inclusive and sustainable economic development. The study employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive method, utilizing in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis involving MSME owners, local government officials, and relevant stakeholders. Data analysis was conducted through an interactive process of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that the implementation of digital governance has facilitated easier access to licensing services, business guidance, digital marketing, and business support for MSMEs. Meanwhile, the implementation of green business practices is becoming evident through the use of eco-friendly raw materials, energy efficiency, waste management, and heightened awareness regarding sustainable production practices. However, the implementation of these concepts still faces various challenges, such as limited digital literacy, restricted access to green financing, low technology adoption, and suboptimal synergy among stakeholders. The study concludes that integrating digital governance and green business practices contributes positively to achieving the SDGs—specifically Goal 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), Goal 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), Goal 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), Goal 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and Goal 13 (Climate Action). Therefore, strengthening policies, enhancing MSME capacity, and fostering collaboration among the government, the business sector, academia, and the community are essential to accelerate the development of competitive and sustainable MSMEs in Pekanbaru City.
References
[1] Ali, Achmad. Uncovering Legal Theory and Jurisprudence. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2009.
[2] Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Imbert, C., Mathew, S., & Pande, R. (2020). E-governance, accountability, and leakage in public programs: Experimental evidence from a financial management reform in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(4), 39–72.
[3] Castro, G. D. R., González, J. A., & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2021). Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A holistic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124559.
[4] Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
[5] ElMassah, S., & Mohieldin, M. (2020). Digital transformation and localizing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Ecological Economics, 169, 106490.
[6] Estevez, E., Janowski, T., & Dzhusupova, Z. (2013). Electronic governance for sustainable development: Conceptual framework and state of research. Government Information Quarterly, 30(Suppl. 1), S94–S109.
[7] Hanisch, M., Goldsby, C. M., Fabian, N. E., & Oehmichen, J. (2023). Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 162, 113868.
[8] Hardin-Ramanan, S., & Mathew, V. (2018). A Green Information Technology governance model for large Mauritian companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 488–497.
[9] Hartanto, D., Sulistyo, H., & Nugroho, R. (2021). Perceived effectiveness of e-governance as an underlying mechanism between good governance and public trust. Regulation & Governance.
[10] Khalil, S., Khalid, M., & Khan, M. (2020). Dynamic capabilities for firm performance under the information technology governance framework. European Business Review, 32(6), 1047–1067.
[11] Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). The coupling and coordination degree of digital business and digital governance in the context of sustainable development. Information, 14(12), 651.
[12] Medaglia, R., & Misuraca, G. (2024). Introduction to the special section on digital government and Sustainable Development Goals. Information Polity, 29(1).
[13] Myeong, S., Kwon, Y., & Seo, H. (2014). Sustainable e-governance: The relationship among trust, digital divide, and e-government. Sustainability, 6(9), 6049–6065.
[14] Sofyani, H., Riyadh, H. A., & Fahlevi, H. (2020). Improving service quality, accountability and transparency of local government: The intervening role of information technology governance. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1).
[15] Tariq, W., Chen, Y., Tariq, A., & Sumbal, M. S. (2026). Digital governance for sustainable development: A holistic review, framework, and roadmap. Technology in Society, 84, 103135.
[16] Varriale, L., Michelino, F., Cammarano, A., & Caputo, M. (2025). Unleashing digital transformation to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals across multiple sectors. Sustainable Development.
[17] Adjei-Bamfo, P., Maloreh-Nyamekye, T., & Ahenkan, A. (2019). The role of e-government in sustainable public procurement: A systematic literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 142, 189–203.
[18] Adam, I. O. (2020). Examining e-government development effects on corruption in Africa. Technology in Society, 63, 101–387.
[19] Adnan, M., et al. (2022). E-participation within the context of e-government initiatives: A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 8, 100021.
[20] Alcaraz-Quiles, F. J., Navarro-Galera, A., & Ortiz-Rodríguez, D. (2014). Factors influencing the transparency of sustainability information in regional governments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 179–191.
[21] Dabić, M., Stojčić, N., Simić, M., Potocan, V., Slavković, M., & Nedelko, Z. (2021). Intellectual agility and innovation in micro and small businesses. Journal of Business Research, 123, 683–695.
[22] Ukko, J., Saunila, M., Nasiri, M., & Rantala, T. (2022). The importance of sustainability engagement in small business supplier collaboration. Sustainable Development, 30(1), 1–9.
[23] Singh, H. P., & Alhulail, H. N. (2023). Information technology governance and corporate boards' relationship with companies' performance. Sustainability, 15(8).
[24] Umbach, G., & Tkalec, I. (2022). Evaluating e-governance through e-government. Evaluation and Program Planning, 93, 102118.
[25] Chatterjee, S., Kar, A. K., & Gupta, M. P. (2018). Success of IoT in smart cities of India. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 349–361.
[26] Axelsson, K., & Granath, M. (2018). Stakeholders' stake and relation to smartness in smart city development. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 693–702.
[27] Buyannemekh, B., & Chen, C. (2021). Digital governance in Mongolia and Taiwan: A gender perspective. Information Polity, 26(3), 327–343.
[28] Behrooz, A., et al. (2023). E-governance: Concept, practice and ethics. Public Management and Governance.
[29] Beshi, T. D., & Kaur, R. (2020). Public trust in local government: Explaining the role of good governance practices. Public Organization Review, 20(2), 337–350.
[30] Rachmawati, R., et al. (2025). Digitalization of MSME in green campaign activities, supply chain, and quality control. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 16(1).
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
