Beyond Form and Symbol: Spatial Position and The Landmark Potential of Popular Monuments, A Visibility Graph Analysis of Tugu Maung In Bandung
DOI:
10.51601/ijersc.v7i5.1142Published:
2026-11-05Downloads
Abstract
Tugu Maung is a series of uniformly designed popular monuments placed on roundabouts, intersections, and traffic islands in Bandung, Indonesia, as gateway markers of the old city district. Because the design is identical across sites, spatial position becomes the distinguishing factor between them, yet the visual performance of each site has not been measured quantitatively. This study measures and compares the visual performance of twelve Tugu Maung sites (TM1–TM12) in terms of visual integration, visual connectivity, and intelligibility. A quantitative-descriptive approach with a comparative multi-case strategy was applied through field surveys and Visibility Graph Analysis (VGA) simulation in depthmapX. Values at each monument (selection) were compared with the value distribution of the entire simulation area (attribute), allowing sites with different area sizes and shapes to be compared on equal terms. The results show that eleven of the twelve sites have visual integration above the simulation-area mean, with the highest normalized ratios at TM8 and TM11, whereas TM1 and TM2 on the northern entry corridor, screened by dense vegetation, have connectivity below the area mean despite their designated gateway function. Intelligibility (R²) ranges from 0.542 at TM5 to 0.955 at TM3 and does not always coincide with the visibility of the monument point, yielding three patterns: highly visible sites in intelligible areas, locally prominent sites in less intelligible areas, and sites with limited visibility despite intelligible surroundings. The findings indicate that the capacity of popular monuments to function as urban markers is also related to spatial position, in addition to form and symbolic meaning; for urban users, spatial position works through visibility and orientation.
Keywords:
Tugu Maung, popular monument, space syntax, visibility graph analysis, intelligibility and landmark.References
[1] Ayobandung, Mengupas asal muasal Tugu Maung, Ayo Bandung, 2018. Accessed: Oct. 22, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.ayobandung.com/bandung/pr-79633885/mengupas-asal-muasal-tugu-maung
[2] Detiknews, Ini fungsi Tugu Maung Bandung yang disebut mirip anjing laut, detikNews, 2017. Accessed: Oct. 22, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-barat/d-3788200/ini-fungsi-tugu-maung-bandung-yang-disebut-mirip-anjing-laut
[3] Tribun Jabar, Tugu dengan ornamen patung maung di Tegallega dicat ulang, Tribun Jabar, 2025. Accessed: Oct. 22, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://jabar.tribunnews.com/metro-bandung/1147385/tugu-dengan-ornamen-patung-maung-di-tegallega-dicat-ulang
[4] H. Lefebvre, The Production of Space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.), Blackwell, Oxford, 1991.
[5] A. Riegl, The modern cult of monuments: Its essence and its development (K. Bruckner, K. Williams, Trans.), in N. Stanley-Price, M.K. Talley Jr., A.M. Vaccaro (Eds.), Historical and Philosophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage, Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, 1996, pp. 69-83. (Original work published 1903)
[6] A. Huyssen, Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2003.
[7] K. Lynch, The Image of the City, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1960.
[8] D. Yesiltepe, R. Conroy Dalton, A. Ozbil Torun, Landmarks in wayfinding: A review of the existing literature, Cognitive Processing, 22(3), 2021, pp. 369-410.
[9] T.T. Brunyé, A.L. Gardony, A. Holmes, H.A. Taylor, Spatial decision dynamics during wayfinding: Intersections prompt the decision-making process, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3, 2018, 13.
[10] S. Jamshidi, M. Ensafi, D. Pati, Wayfinding in interior environments: An integrative review, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2020, 549628.
[11] B. Hillier, J. Hanson, The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.
[12] B. Hillier, A. Penn, J. Hanson, T. Grajewski, J. Xu, Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1), 1993, pp. 29-66.
[13] B. Hillier, Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
[14] M.L. Benedikt, To take hold of space: Isovists and isovist fields, Environment and Planning B, 6(1), 1979, pp. 47-65.
[15] M. Batty, Exploring isovist fields: Space and shape in architectural and urban morphology, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(1), 2001, pp. 123-150.
[16] A. Turner, M. Doxa, D. O'Sullivan, A. Penn, From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(1), 2001, pp. 103-121.
[17] A. Turner, Analysing the visual dynamics of spatial morphology, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(5), 2003, pp. 657-676.
[18] A. Turner, Depthmap 4: A Researcher's Handbook, Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, University College London, London, 2004.
[19] J. Desyllas, E. Duxbury, Axial maps and visibility graph analysis: A comparison of their methodology and use in models of urban pedestrian movement, Proceedings of the 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, 2001, pp. 27.1-27.13.
[20] Y.O. Kim, A. Penn, Linking the spatial syntax of cognitive maps to the spatial syntax of the environment, Environment and Behavior, 36(4), 2004, pp. 483-504.
[21] E. Morello, C. Ratti, A digital image of the city: 3D isovists in Lynch's urban analysis, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(5), 2009, pp. 837-853.
[22] K. Andayani, S. Juwono, A. Ali, D. Aryanti, A. Hardiansyah, Reading memory and transformative space in Jakarta’s National and West Irian Liberation Monuments, Paradigma, 23(1), 2026, pp. 150-166.
[23] Tomy Wijaya, S. Yusuf, Monumen Nasional: Symbols of authority and modernity in Jakarta’s development from 2012 to 2022, ASANKA: Journal of Social Science and Education, 6(2), 2025, pp. 375-385.
[24] C. Yamu, A. van Nes, C. Garau, Bill Hillier's legacy: Space syntax—A synopsis of basic concepts, measures, and empirical application, Sustainability, 13(6), 2021, 3394.
[25] J.H. Lee, M.J. Ostwald, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic models for Space Syntax studies on spatial experience, City, Territory and Architecture, 11, 2024, 3.
[26] M. Gath-Morad, J. Grübel, K. Steemers, K. Sailer, L. Ben-Alon, C. Hölscher, L. Aguilar, The role of strategic visibility in shaping wayfinding behavior in multilevel buildings, Scientific Reports, 14, 2024, 3735.
[27] E. Celik, O.C. Yildirim, Wayfinding in historical urban landscapes: Unraveling the spatial-behavioral dynamics in Eskisehir's Odunpazari, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 25(3), 2026, pp. 1849-1868.
[28] H. Iftikhar, P. Shah, Y. Luximon, Human wayfinding behaviour and metrics in complex environments: A systematic literature review, Architectural Science Review, 64(5), 2021, pp. 452-463.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
