The Impact Of The Loss Of The Basement Seen From The Side Of The Principle Of Social Function

Authors

  • Nindya Annastasya Saputri Sebelas Maret University Faculty of Law, Master of Notary, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Adi Sulistiyono Sebelas Maret University Faculty of Law, Master of Notary, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Sapto Hermawan Sebelas Maret University Faculty of Law, Master of Notary, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i3.569

Abstract

The basement is a building that is below ground level; currently, with the increasing need for land to be built because of the increasing population, a basement will be built to be used as an underground building. The MRT, basement parking lots, and shops are examples of buildings currently being built.  The building must follow the social function regulated in the UUPA so that it can be enjoyed and used by all parties and communities so that what is achieved for the greatest prosperity of the people has been achieved properly. However, it does not rule out the possibility of damage or loss of the underground, causing a negative social impact on the damage and loss of the basement. This research uses a type of normative research by analyzing using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The source of legal materials is the UUPA, the 1945 Constitution, and Government Regulation 18  of 2021 which regulates a few concerning using basements. The goal is to be able to answer all the problems that will be raised in the research in this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhim, N. (2019). Penggunaan Ruang Bawah Tanah Dilema Antara Kebutuhan dan Pengaturan. Jurnal Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, 4, 1–11.

Alrip, I., & Kadarudin, K. (2021). Problematika Penggunaan Ruang Bawah Tanah Dari Aspek Yuridis. HERMENEUTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2). http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/HERMENEUTIKA/user/setLocale/NEW_LOCALE?source=%2Findex.php%2FHERMENEUTIKA%2Farticle%2Fview%2F5938%2F2608

Bobylev, N. (2009). Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city’s Master plan: A case of Urban Underground Space use. Land Use Policy, 26(4), 1128–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.003

Foster, Sehila, Bonilla, D. (2011). The Social Function of Property: A Comparative Law Perspective. Fordham Law Review, 80, 101.

Grecksch, K. (2021). Out of sight � out of regulation? Underground space governance in the UK. Journal of the British Academy, 9s10(November), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/009s10.043

Hámor-Vidó, M., Hámor, T., & Czirok, L. (2021). Underground space is the legal governance of a critical resource in the circular economy. Resources Policy, 73(October). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102171

Hukum, P., Polis, P., Pembaharuan, P., Asuransi, P., Kasus, P., Bayar, G., & Jiwasraya, P. T. (2022). Tanjungpura acta borneo journal. 1(1), 1–22.

Li, Y., Qian, X., Zhang, S., Sheng, J., Hou, L., & Yuan, M. (2023). Assessment of gas explosion risk in underground spaces adjacent to a gas pipeline. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 131(November 2021), 104785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104785

Qiao, Y. K., Peng, F. Le, Sabri, S., & Rajabifard, A. (2019). Socio-environmental costs of underground space use for urban sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51(August), 101757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101757

Rubaie Achmad. (2007). Hukum Pengadaan Tanah untuk Kepentingan Umum. Bayumedia.

Sibuea, H. Y. P. (2013). Tinjauan Yuridis Atas Pemanfaatan Ruang Di Bawah Tanah. Negara Hukum, 4(Land Reform), 18–34. https://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/194/135

Sitorus, Oloan dan Sierrad, Z. (2006). Hukum Agraria Konsep Dasar dan Implementasi. Mitra Kebijakan Tanah Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Annastasya Saputri, N. ., Sulistiyono, A. ., & Hermawan, S. . (2023). The Impact Of The Loss Of The Basement Seen From The Side Of The Principle Of Social Function. International Journal of Educational Research &Amp; Social Sciences, 4(3), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i3.569

Issue

Section

Articles