AI-Powered Writing Tools on Indonesian Higher Education: How Do Educators See It?

Authors

  • Dangin Dangin English Language and Education Program, Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Andi Dian Rahmawan English Language and Education Program, Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Agustinus Hary Setyawan English Language and Education Program, Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i5.721

Abstract

This study was intended to explore educators’ point of view in higher education related to AIpowered writing tools on students’ writing skills. By means of phenomenological research using
lived-experience approach by Manen (2016), the study endeavored to find detail information of six
higher education teachers from four Indonesian private Universities related to their perspective of
the use of AI-powered writing tools in higher education. The study revealed four main aspects
namely strength, weakness, opportunity and threats. AI-powered writing tools deliberately bring
positive sights on their implication in language learning. These constructive points are time and
access efficiency in practice which enable users to use it as simple as possible. These tools are also
seen to be good in providing real-time feedback and helping users to synthesize the materials
quickly. Moreover, these tools covey their weakness as seem to produce unnatural work and use
sophisticated dictions where sometimes are irrelevant. Furthermore, this study found that the
respondents also highlight some possible threats led by the implication of those AI-powered writing
tools. They saw the use of these tools recurrently will give rise to dependence on the tools and
decrease students’ capability. Those tools are believed to decrease students’ creative and critical
thinking when students feel comfortable in using it as their problem solvers in writing projects.
From the findings, it can be construed that AI-powered writing tools could bring both positive and
negative impact on the users. The study suggested that further researchers could explore the
mitigation of possible threats of the integration of AI-powered writing tools and academic use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akinwalere, S. N., & Ivanov, V. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Challenges and

Opportunities. Border Crossing, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33182/bc.v12i1.2015

Alharbi, W. (2023a). AI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing

Assistance Tools. Education Research International, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331

Alharbi, W. (2023b). AI in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Pedagogical Overview of Automated Writing

Assistance Tools. Education Research International, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331

Safrida, S., Tannady, H., Solissa, E. M., Sapulete, H., & Al Haddar, G. (2023). Strategic Leadership Analysis of

School Principal to Improve Learning Quality. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan, 11(2), 391-399.

Ariyanti, A., & Anam, S. (2021). Technology-Enhanced Paraphrasing Tool to Improve EFL Students’ Writing

Achievement and Enjoyment. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(3), 715.

https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v6i3.698

Baskara, R. F., & Mukarto, F. X. (2023). Exploring the Implications of ChatGPT for Language Learning in

Higher Education. In Language Learning in Higher Education Indonesian Journal of English Language

Teaching and Applied Linguistics (Vol. 7, Issue 2). http://dx.doi.org/10.210

Lubis, H., & Pratama, K., Safrida, S. (2022). HR related antecedes to sustainability reporting in Indonesian

public listed firm: The mediating role of employee committeemen. Cuadernos de Economía, 45(128), 87-97.

Burkhard, M. (2022). Student Perceptions Of Ai-Powered Writing Tools: Towards Individualized Teaching

Strategies. https://www.grammarly.com/plagiarism-checker

Cardon, P., Fleischmann, C., Aritz, J., Logemann, M., & Heidewald, J. (2023). The Challenges and Opportunities

of AI-Assisted Writing: Developing AI Literacy for the AI Age. Business and Professional Communication

Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231176517

Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. Ben. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence

generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport,

(2), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.5114/BIOLSPORT.2023.125623

Simamora, R. N. H., & Elviani, S. (2022). Carbon emission disclosure in Indonesia: Viewed from the aspect of

board of directors, managerial ownership, and audit committee. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 1-9.

Fitria, T. N. (2022). Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies Avoiding Plagiarism of Students’ Scientific

Writing by Using the QuillBot Paraphraser ARTICLE HISTORY. 4(3), 252–262.

https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i2.9917

Hyland-Wood, D., Harrison, A., & Kolera, B. (2019). Righting writing’s wrongs: Toward effective writing

partnerships between humans and AI. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(5), 1306–1318.

https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070516

Ingley, S. J., & Pack, A. (2023). Leveraging AI tools to develop the writer rather than the writing. In Trends in

Ecology and Evolution. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2023.05.007

Iqbal, N., Ahmed, H., & Azhar, K. A. (2022). EXPLORING TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS USING

CHATGPT. Global Journal for Management and Administrative Sciences, 3(4), 97–111.

https://doi.org/10.46568/gjmas.v3i4.163

Siregar, Z., Tarigan, N. M. R., & Sahnan, M. (2022). Strengthening Human Resources Through Introduction and

Stunting Prevention. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(7), 1221-1228.

Koch, A. M., & Dangin. (2023). Lived Experience on Mentimeter as Students Response Systems (SRS) in ELT

Classroom: A Swot Analysis. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, 6(7), 4610–4616.

https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i7-95

International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

https://ijersc.org/

Kushmar, L. V., Vornachev, A. O., Korobova, I. O., & Kaida, N. O. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Language

Learning: What Are We Afraid of. Arab World English Journal, 8, 262–273.

https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.18

Manen, M. van. (2016). Researching Lived Experience Second Edition (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content

and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2).

https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469

Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing

assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014

Tarigan, N. M. R., & Wasesa, S. (2020). The Influence of Organizational Culture on Increasing Employee

Motivation in Sumut Bank of Sharia Unit, North Sumatera. Britain International of Humanities and Social

Sciences (BIoHS) Journal, 2(2), 440-449.

Otterbacher, J. (2023). Why technical solutions for detecting AI-generated content in research and education are

insufficient. In Patterns (Vol. 4, Issue 7). Cell Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100796

Owan, V. J., Abang, K. B., Idika, D. O., Etta, E. O., & Bassey, B. A. (2023). Exploring the potential of artificial

intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and

Technology Education, 19(8), em2307. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13428

Parra, G. L., & Calero, S. X. (2019). Automated writing evaluation tools in the improvement of the writing skill.

International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12214a

Sarkum, S., Syamsuri, A. R., & Supriadi, S. (2020). The role of multi-actor engagement. Journal of Open

Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 176.

Rogerson, A. M., & McCarthy, G. (2017). Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting

or facilitated plagiarism? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(1).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-016-0013-y

Siegle, D. (2023). A Role for ChatGPT and AI in Gifted Education. Gifted Child Today, 46(3), 211–219.

https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175231168443

Suraworachet, W., Zhou, Q., & Cukurova, M. (2023). Impact of combining human and analytics feedback on

students’ engagement with, and performance in, reflective writing tasks. International Journal of Educational

Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00368-0

Syahnaz, M., & Fithriani, R. (2023). Utilizing Artificial Intelligence-based Paraphrasing Tool in EFL Writing

Class: A Focus on Indonesian University Students’ Perceptions. Scope : Journal of English Language

Teaching, 7(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v7i2.14882

Tuomi, I. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on learning, teaching, and education policies for the future

(M. Cabrera, R. Vuorikari, & Y. Punie, Eds.; 1st ed.). Publications Office of the European Union.

Yang, G. (2020). The Application of Artificial Intelligence in English Teaching. International Journal of

Frontiers in Sociology, 2, 76–81. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJFS.2020.020309.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

How to Cite

Dangin, D., Dian Rahmawan, A. ., & Hary Setyawan, A. . (2023). AI-Powered Writing Tools on Indonesian Higher Education: How Do Educators See It?. International Journal of Educational Research &Amp; Social Sciences, 4(5), 818–822. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i5.721