The Rationality Of The Judge's Decision States That Good Faith Is The Basis For Canceling The Lease Agreement For Land And Buildings Under His Control

Authors

  • Fajar Desy Nur Aini Master Of Notary,Faculty of law, Sebelas maret university, Indonesia
  • Lego Karjoko Law Faculty Lecturer, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia
  • Tuhana Tuhana Law Faculty Lecturer, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v5i2.796

Keywords:

Legal protection, Underhand agreement, Renting land and buildings and Renter.

Abstract

In general, when people make written agreements regarding the rental of land and house buildings, they are usually made privately, some of which are notarized (Notarial Deeds), some parties choose to make written agreements regarding the rental of land and house buildings. made by hand with sufficient stamp duty. One example of the Supreme Court Decision Number 1078 K/Pdt/2021, the basis of the lawsuit filed by the Plaintiff is Bad Faith committed by the owner of the rental object in the lease extension agreement for the land and building under his control, then the actions or actions of the owner of the leased object can be categorized as an act of breach of contract or breach of contract. This research aims to find out whether there is a rational basis for the judge's decision which states good faith as a basis for canceling land and building lease agreements based on Supreme Court Decision Number 1078 K/Pdt/2021. This research method uses normative juridical research using a case approach. The analysis technique used is the syllogism method and interpretation using deductive thinking patterns. The results of the research and discussion can be concluded that legal rationality is needed by judges in carrying out their considerations in order to determine decisions that contain the values ​​of justice and the law that applies in Indonesia. This does not only apply to one type of legal rationality but also applies to other types. The use of this type of legal rationality requires looking at the relationship between facts, norms, morals and doctrine in considering the judge's decision. The issue of default used in the main issue in the decision becomes a boomerang for the tenant, in this case the tenant, because there is no legal force in the rental agreement signed by the tenant with the renting party. Different conditions will occur if the rental agreement is made before a notary and explains that they have entered into an agreement and asks the Notary to make a deed, then this deed is a deed made before a Notary (Notarial Deed). So in this case, the parties to the agreement have legal certainty and are therefore legally protected, so that if a dispute occurs in the implementation of the agreement, the judge with his decision can force the violating party to carry out its rights and obligations according to the agreement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar Mastang, M. (2022). Akibat Hukum Akta Jual Beli Yang Dibatalkan Oleh Pengadilan Terhadap Pembeli Yang Beritikad Baik (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomo 60/PDT/ 2018/PT BTN). Recital Review Vol. 4 No. 2 , 383.

Annisa Nur Azizah, L. P. (2023). Tanggung jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) terhadap pihak yang memberikan keterangan palsu. legal standing, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol.7 No.1, 35.

Lysanza Salawati, A. M. (2022). Akibat Hukum Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) Karena Adanya Gugatan Terkait Dokumen Palsu Dan Keterangan Palsu Dalam Pembuatan Akta. Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol 9 Nomor 3, 684.

Prawira, I. G. (2016). Tanggung Jawab PPAT terhadap akta jual beli tanah . Jurnal IUS, Vol IV Nomor 1, 72.

Shela Oktaharyani Harahap, B. D. (2021). Kekuatan hukum akta jual beli yang datanya merupakan data palsu. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, Volume 4 Nomor 2, 1298.

Amiruddin, and Zainal Asikin. 2018. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum (Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada).

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2014. Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group).

Hans Kelsen. 2007. Sebagaimana diterjemahkan oleh Somardi, General Theory Of Law and State, Teori Umum Hukum dan Negara, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif Sebagai Ilmu Hukum Deskriptif Empirik (Jakarta: BEE Media Indonesia ).

Subekti, & Tjitrosudibio, R. KUHPerdata. Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 2005, hlm. 69

Harahap, Arman ,2018, Macrozoobenthos diversity as bioindicator of water quality in the Bilah river, Rantauprapat, Medan. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1116 052026.

Harahap, A. P. Hrp, N.K.A.R. Dewi, Macrozoobenthos diversity as anbioindicator of the water quality in the River Kualuh Labuhanbatu Utara, International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(4), 2020, pp. 179-183.

Harahap, A. et, all, Macrozoobenthos diversity as anbioindicator of the water quality in the Sungai Kualuh Labuhanbatu Utara, AACL Bioflux, 2022, Vol 15, Issue 6.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2006, hlm. 82.

Teubner, Gunther, Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law, dalam Law and Society Review, volume 17, Nomor 2, 1983, hlm. 79.

HM. Soerya Respationo; M. Guntur Hamzah, Putusan Hakim: Menuju Rasionalitas Hukum Refleksif Dalam Penegakan Hukum, Jurnal Yustisia Vol.2 No.2 Mei - Agustus 2013, hlm. 105.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-27

How to Cite

Desy Nur Aini, F., Karjoko, L. ., & Tuhana, T. (2024). The Rationality Of The Judge’s Decision States That Good Faith Is The Basis For Canceling The Lease Agreement For Land And Buildings Under His Control. International Journal of Educational Research &Amp; Social Sciences, 5(2), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v5i2.796

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)