Determinants of Economic Functioning among Informal Worker Households Using the District Minimum Wage as a Benchmark: Empirical Evidence from Gunungkidul
DOI:
10.51601/ijersc.v7i5.1087Published:
2026-10-12Downloads
Abstract
Measuring welfare in the informal sector can be biased when it relies on fluctuating nominal income rather than actual household expenditure. This study applies the Capability Approach to examine how resources shape the economic functioning of informal worker households in Gunungkidul, Indonesia, using real household consumption expenditure as a proxy for functioning. The study contributes by shifting the unit of analysis to households and introducing the District Minimum Wage (UMK) as a conceptual benchmark. Using March 2025 National Socioeconomic Survey (Susenas) data covering 464 informal worker households, the study applies binary logistic regression. The model shows good discriminatory capacity, with an AUC of 0.788 and a Nagelkerke R-squared of 0.321. Male-headed households have substantially higher odds of achieving expenditure above the UMK. Financial inclusion shows contrasting effects: account ownership is negatively associated with the outcome, while credit, digital money, and combined financial services are positively associated, with combined services showing the largest odds ratio. Business-oriented internet use has a stronger positive association than general internet access. Higher education and longer working hours are positively associated with the probability of expenditure above the UMK, whereas age has a negative association. The findings highlight the importance of human capital, productive financial inclusion, business-oriented digitalization, and demographic characteristics in expanding the economic capabilities of informal worker households.
Keywords:
Informal sector; household consumption expenditure; Capability Approach; District Minimum Wage; financial inclusion; digitalization; binary logistic regression.References
[1]. Allen, F., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., & Peria, M. S. M. (2016). The foundations of financial inclusion: Understanding ownership and use of formal accounts. Journal of financial Intermediation, 27, 1-30.
[2]. Alkumairoh, A. F., & Warsitasari, W. D. (2022). Pengaruh Modal Usaha, Jam Kerja Dan Lama Usaha Terhadap Pendapatan Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah Pedagang Pasar Gambar Kecamatan Wonodadi Kabupaten Blitar. SOSEBI: Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa Ilmu Sosial Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, 2(2), 202-219.
[3]. Armansyah, A., & Sukamdi, S. (2021). Formalisasi sektor informal: Proses, faktor pengaruh, dan dampak pada pelaku usaha sektor informal di Kota Palembang. Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia, 16(1), 67-80.
[4]. Badan Pusat Statistik (2024). Indikator Kesejahteraan Rakyat 2024. Badan Pusat Statistik.
[5]. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Gunungkidul (2025). Indeks pembangunan manusia Kabupaten Gunungkidul 2024. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Gunungkidul.
[6]. Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. 3rd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[7]. Hastuti (2015). Strategi bertahan hidup rumah tangga miskin dengan kepala rumah tangga perempuan. SOCIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 10(2). 91-99.
[8]. Mankiw, N. G. (2018). Principles of economics. 8th ed. Cengage Learning.
[9]. Modigliani, F. and Brumberg, R. (1954). Utility analysis and the consumption function: An interpretation of cross-section data. In: K. K. Kurihara (ed.) Post-Keynesian economics. Rutgers University Press.
[10]. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 36 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengupahan.
[11]. Pitoyo, A. J. (2007). Dinamika Sektor Informal di Indonesia. Populasi, 18(2), 129-146.
[12]. Sahputri, R. A. M., Sujarwoto, S., Sihombing, S., & Njoman, M. G. (2024). Financial inclusion in Indonesia: An analysis of determinants of bank account ownership and credit access at individual and regional levels. Economics and Finance in Indonesia, 70(2), 81-96.
[13]. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
[14]. Syafitri, W., Fitanto, B., & Setyanti, A. M. (2024). Exploring the nexus between poverty line, minimum wage, and welfare: Evidence from Indonesia's industrial labor. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 25(2), 291-306.
[15]. Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New media & society, 16(3), 507-526.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




