Responsibilites of Instrumental Witnesses In The Preparation of Notarial Deeds Containing Defects

Authors

  • Luthfi Ius Budiasto Master of Notary Program, Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto Lecturer of the Master of Notary Program, Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Hari Purwadi Lecturer of the Master of Notary Program, Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v6i4.991

Abstract

A notary deed serves as an authentic piece of evidence in a legal relationship, which requires the presence of not only a notary but also an instrumental witness. The existence of instrumental witnesses is a condition for the validity of a deed, because a deed without instrumental witnesses will lose its authenticity. However, when a deed contains formal or material defects, questions arise as to the extent of the responsibility imposed on the witnesses. This study uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach, examining the Law on Notary Positions (UUJN), the Civil Code, and relevant doctrines. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of instrumental witnesses in making notary deeds containing defects. This research is a normative legal research with a legislative approach. The analysis was carried out using the theory of legal responsibility and the theory of legal protection as the basis for argument. The results of the study show that the responsibilities of instrumental witnesses should be limited to formal aspects, such as attendance and deed signing. Therefore, a renewal of the notarial law is needed that explicitly regulates the limits of responsibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adjie, H. (2009). Civil Sanctions and Notary Administration as Public Officials. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Ashofa, B. (2010). Legal Research Methods. Title: A Variety of Creations.

Bintang, S. (1998). Copyright Law. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Damain, E. (1999). Copyright law according to several international conventions. Copyright Act 1997 and its Protection of Books and Publishing Agreements. Bangalore: P.T Alumni.

Dhaniaty, M. (2019). The position of the instrumental witness on the Notary Deed which raises problems in civil cases. Journal of Legal and Judicial Media, p. Sec. 123.

Eric M. Dobrusin, R. A. (2012). Intellectual Property Culture : Strategies to Foster Successful Patent and Trade Secret Pracices In Every Business. Oxford University Press.

Eudea Adeli Arsy, H. N. (2021). The responsibility of the notary for deeds that are legally defective and not in accordance with the provisions for making deeds in the Law on the Notary Position. Journal of Bina Mulia Hukum, 6.1, 132.

Andony,A.A.(2020).The position of notary employees as witnesses in authentic deeds in the investigation and judicial process is reviewed by the Law on the Notary Position. Journal of Civil Procedure Law ADHPER, 83.

Hanna Nathasya, R. H. (2016). The Position of Instrumental Witnesses in the Making of Notary Deeds in National Law. Unimed Journal, 8.2, 14.

Hatta Isnaini Wahyu Utomo, I. S. ( 2019). The Responsibility of Former Notary Employees as a Deed Witness to the Confidentiality of the Deed. Res Judicata, Vol. 2, No. 1, 214.

Hidayah, K. (2013). Student Understanding Level of Copyright Protection of Written Works (Study of Students of UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang). de Jure, Journal of Sharia and Law, V Number 1, 52-66.

I Komang Sujanayasa, I. R. (2016). The Position of Witnesses in Notary Deeds in relation to Article 16 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Office of Notary. Scientific Journal of Notary Master Study Program, 2.

Great Dictionary of Indonesian. (t.yr.). Quoted 2020, from https://kbbi.web.id/cetak

Lubis, S. K. (2014). Ethics of the Legal Profession. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Mansyur, A. M. (2015, September - December). Identification of Fair Use/Fair Dealing of Copyright on Books in the Development of Science and Technology in Higher Education in Central Java.

Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Legal Research Revised Edition. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mashdurohmatun, A. (2013). Developing the Social Function of Indonesian Copyright (A Study on Book Copyright). Surakarta: Doctoral Program in Law, Faculty of Law, UNS.

Muhammad Djumhana, R. D. (2003). Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): New Industrial Design Regulations. Bandung: PT. Image of Aditya Bakti.

Pambudi, H. (1986). Basic Guidelines for Book Publishing. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan Library.

Pomantow, V. (2018). Legal consequences of authentic deeds that are formally defective based on Article 1869 of the Civil Code. Lex Privatum, Vol. VI, No.7 , p. Sec. 94.

Raharjo, R. S. (2018, December 31). Legal Protection for the Creator for the Registration of the Same Copyright. Law Lantern, 5(3), 437-456.

Saidin. (1995). Legal Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Simatupang, R. B. (t.thn.). Legal Aspects in Business. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Stephens, B. (2012). Books and Their Development. Depok: Rajawali.

Sjahputra, I. (2007). Intellectual Property Rights (An Introduction). Jakarta: Marvindo.

Soekanto, S. (2010). Introduction to Legal Research. Jakarta: UI Press.

Sutopo, C. H. (2000). Qualitative Research Methodology. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-28

How to Cite

Ius Budiasto, L. ., Sentot Sudarwanto, A. ., & Purwadi, H. (2025). Responsibilites of Instrumental Witnesses In The Preparation of Notarial Deeds Containing Defects . International Journal of Educational Research &Amp; Social Sciences, 6(4), 489–493. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v6i4.991

Most read articles by the same author(s)