The Using Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model for Evaluating Online College EFL Learning

Authors

  • Sinarman Jaya Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu Zip Code 38119: Indonesia.
  • Syukri Hamzah Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu Zip Code 38119: Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i6.559

Keywords:

Online learning, context, input, process, and product (CIPP)

Abstract

This research attempts to evaluate the effectiveness of online learning at English Education Study of Muhammadiyah University Bengkulu for period 2020-2021 using context, input, process, and product (CIPP) evaluation model. This qualitative research design uses descriptive evaluative. The data collection instrument used closed questionnaire, structured interviews, and documentation.  The data processing techniques refers to the Guttman’s Scale. The result indicated the average value of the context evaluation aspects (0.89), input (0.80), and process evaluation (0.82) and product evaluation (0.85). Thus, it can be concluded that online learning program is appropriate and effective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustina, N. Q., & Mukhtaruddin, F (2019) ‘The Cipp Model-Based Evaluation on Integrated English Learning

(IEL) Program at Language Center’, English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2(1),.

Alonso, D. A., Kok, SK, & O Brien, S (2018) ‘Understanding approaches to innovation through the dynamic

capabilities lens: A multi-country study of the wine industry’, International Journal of Innovation

Management [Preprint].

Ana, A., Minghat, A.D., Purnawarman, P., Saripudin, S., Muktiarni, M., Dwiyanti, V., & Mustakim, S.S. (2020)

‘Students’ Perceptions of the Twists and Turns of E-learning in the Midst of the Covid 19 Outbreak’, Revista

Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala. 12(1Sup2), pp. 15–26.

Cahyadi, A., Hendryadi, Widyastuti, S., & Suryani (2022) ‘COVID-19, emergency remote teaching evaluation’,

Education and Information Technologies.

Clinefelter et al. (2019) ‘survey of current and prospective online students’, Online_Ed.

Eisingerich, A. B., & Rubera, G (2010) ‘Drivers of Brand Commitment: A Cross- National Investigation’,

Journal of International Marketing, pp. 64-79.

Fitriyani, Y., Fauzi., dan Sari, M. Z (2020) ‘Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa pada Pembelajaran daring selama

Pandemik Covid19’, Jurnal Kependidikan: Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan,

Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran, 6 (2), pp. 165–175.

Fitzpatrick, Jody L, James R. Sander & Blaine R. and Worthen. (2004) ‘Program Evaluation Alternative

Approaches and Practical Guidelines’, in. Boston: Pearson Education Inc: Boston.

International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences ISSN: 2774-5406

https://ijersc.org/

Gunawan, H. & Hidayatullah, A (2020) ‘Pengembangan Buku Ajar Mata Kuliah Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis

Pendidikan Karakter dan Berorientasi Kearifan Lokal’, Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia serta

Pembelajarannya, pp. 76–81.

Hair, Joseph F. Jr. et al (2010) ‘Multivariate Data Analysis’, in. Harlow. England: PearsonEducation Limited, p.

Huang, R. H., Liu, D. J., Tlili, A., Yang, J. F., & Wang, H (2020) ‘Handbook on Facilitating Flexible Learning

during Educational Disruption: The Chinese Experience in Maintaining Undisrupted Learning in COVID-19

Outbreak’, https://iite.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Handbook-on-FacilitatingFlexible-Learning-inCOVID-19-Outbreak-SLIBNU-V1.2-20200315.pdf pada bulan September 2020.

Isodarus, P. B (2017) ‘Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Teks’, Sintesis: Jurnal Ilmiah Kebudayaan, pp.

–11.

Lee, S. Y., Shin, J-S., & Lee, S-H (2019) ‘How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation

Model in Medical Health Education.’, Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 16(40, pp.

–8.

Lengsfeld, J (2018) ‘Digitalization Expert’, LIC, OEC, HSG.

Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T (2012) ‘Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide’, The

Guilford Press. [Preprint].

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J (2018) ‘Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook’’, in.

SAGE Publications.

Patton, M.Q. (2002) ‘Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods’, in. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications., p.

Pilkington, O. A. (2018) ‘Active Learning for an Online Composition Classroom: Blogging as an Enhancement

of Online Curriculum’, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47 (2):, pp. 1-14.

Powell, W. W., & Dimaggio, P. J (1991) ‘New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis’, in. Chicago:

University of Chicago Press.

Raibowo, S., & Nopiyanto, Y. E. (2020) ‘Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga & Kesehatan

pada SMP Negeri Se-Kabupaten Mukomuko melalui Pendekatan Model Context, Input, Process & Product

(CIPP)’, Jurnal Pendidikan Kesehatan Rekreasi, p. 6(2).

Riaz, A (2018) ‘Effects of Online Education on Encoding and Decoding Process of Students and Teachers.’, .

International Conference E-Learning, pp. 42–48.

Sahla, W. A., Mukhlisah, N., Julkawait, J. & Irwansyah, R (2019) ‘IbM-Pelatihan Teknik Penulisan Parafrase

Untuk Skripsi Mahasiswa Sebagai Upaya Menghindari Plagiarisme.’, Jurnal Impact: Implementation and

Action, pp. 162-168.

Salmiati, S (2015) ‘Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Parafrase Menggunakan Metode Mind Mapping.’,

Jurnal Pelangi, 8(1), pp. 87–103.

Sanusi, A., Maulana, D., & Sabarno, R. (2021) ‘Evaluation of Students Writing Skills Using CIPP model in

Arabic Learning’:, The Concept and its Implementation. Conference: The 4th Proceeding International

Conference on Arabic Language and Literature (ICALL).

Singh, G., ’donoghue, J. O., & Worton, H (2005) ‘A Study Into The Effects Of eLearning On Higher Education’,

Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, p. 2(1).

Stufflebeam, D (2003) ‘The CIPP model of evaluation.’, in. Springer international handbooks of education.

Tsani, I., Arsyadana, A., Sufirmansyah, & Shafira, E. (2021) ‘Evaluasi Model CIPP Pada Pembelajaran PAI dan

Budi Pekerti di SMA Negeri 7 Kota Kediri’, Al- Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, pp. 17-45.

Warsita, Bambang (2008) ‘Teknologi Pembelajaran: Landasan &Aplikasinya’, in. Jakarta: Rineka, pp. 150–151.

Worthen, B.R & Sanders, J.R (1987) ‘Educational Evaluation. AlternativeApproaches and Practical Guidelines’,

in. New York & London: LongmanInc, p. 137.

Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, and C., & Misulis, K. (2011) ‘Using the

context, input,process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the

planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs’, . Journal of Higher Education

Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), pp. 57-84.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-27

How to Cite

Jaya, S., & Hamzah, S. . (2022). The Using Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model for Evaluating Online College EFL Learning. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC), 3(6), 2460–2470. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i6.559